Σ01 soundness isn’t enough: Number theoretic indeterminacy’s unsavory physical commitments
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (forthcoming)
Abstract
It’s sometimes suggested that we can (in a sense) settle the truth-value of some statements in the language of number theory by stipulation, adopting either φ or ¬φ as an additional axiom. For example, in Clarke-Doane (2020b) and a series of recent APA presentations, Clarke-Doane suggests that any Σ01 sound expansion of our current arithmetical practice would express a truth. In this paper, I’ll argue that (given a certain popular assumption about the model-theoretic representability of languages like ours) we can’t know ourselves to have any such freedom.Author's Profile
DOI
10.1086/714813
My notes
Similar books and articles
Manipulation and Unsavory Seduction.Eric Cave - 2014 - In Manipulation. New York, NY, USA: pp. 176-200.
Supervenience Physicalism and the Berry Paradox.Douglas V. Porpora - 2021 - Philosophia 49 (4):1681-1693.
Clause tableaux for maximum and minimum satisfiability.Josep Argelich, Chu Min Li, Felip Manyà & Joan Ramon Soler - 2021 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 29 (1):7-27.
A meta-ontological criticism of Eli Hirsch’s semanticist attack on physical object ontology.Carl Murphy - unknown
Unifying Functional Interpretations.Paulo Oliva - 2006 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 47 (2):263-290.
On Commitments and Other Uncertainty Reduction Tools in Joint Action.John Michael & Elisabeth Pacherie - 2015 - Journal of Social Ontology 1 (1):89–120.
An ontology for commitments in multiagent systems. [REVIEW]Munindar P. Singh - 1999 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 7 (1):97-113.
Analytics
Added to PP
2021-04-16
Downloads
97 (#129,099)
6 months
44 (#30,642)
2021-04-16
Downloads
97 (#129,099)
6 months
44 (#30,642)
Historical graph of downloads