Aesthetics and Environment Reconsidered: Reply to Carlson: Articles

British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (3):315-318 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Allen Carlson finds three central problems in my book, Aesthetics and Environment : that it lacks a criterion of the aesthetic itself, that my proposal, aesthetic engagement, is excessively subjective, and that we cannot therefore distinguish between ‘easy’ and ‘serious’ beauty. I respond by uncovering the metaphysical assumptions on which his critique rests and offer more plausible alternatives. I argue, further, that their implications are not only acceptable but fully satisfactory.

Similar books and articles

Critical notice: Aesthetics and environment.Allen Carlson - 2006 - British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (4):416-427.
On Allen Carlson's Environmental Model.Fu-Xing Xue - 2010 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 1:60-70.
Aesthetics and the Environment.Allen Carlson - 2001 - Mind 110 (438):448-452.
Introduction: The aesthetics of nature.Allen Carlson & Arnold Berleant - 2004 - In Allen Carlson & Arnold Berleant (eds.), The Aesthetics of Natural Environments. Broadview Press. pp. 11--42.


Added to PP

215 (#61,128)

6 months
22 (#57,510)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Arnold Berleant
Long Island University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references