Aesthetics and Environment Reconsidered: Reply to Carlson: Articles

British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (3):315-318 (2007)

Authors
Arnold Berleant
Long Island University
Abstract
Allen Carlson finds three central problems in my book, Aesthetics and Environment : that it lacks a criterion of the aesthetic itself, that my proposal, aesthetic engagement, is excessively subjective, and that we cannot therefore distinguish between ‘easy’ and ‘serious’ beauty. I respond by uncovering the metaphysical assumptions on which his critique rests and offer more plausible alternatives. I argue, further, that their implications are not only acceptable but fully satisfactory.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/aesthj/aym010
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Critical Notice: Aesthetics and Environment.Allen Carlson - 2006 - British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (4):416-427.
On Allen Carlson's Environmental Model.Fu-Xing Xue - 2010 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 1:60-70.
Aesthetics and the Environment.Allen Carlson - 2001 - Mind 110 (438):448-452.
Introduction: The Aesthetics of Nature.Allen Carlson & Arnold Berleant - 2004 - In Allen Carlson & Arnold Berleant (eds.), The Aesthetics of Natural Environments. Broadview Press. pp. 11--42.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
117 ( #67,276 of 2,266,272 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #43,896 of 2,266,272 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature