Philosophical Papers 32 (1):65-82 (2003)
Abstract Ernest Sosa has argued that the relevant alternatives theory of knowledge has yet to overcome serious difficulties. The most serious difficulty is that of providing criteria for when a rival alternative to a claim is relevant. Without such criteria, the theory is ad hoc. I argue that most other externalist theories of knowledge, including Sosa's own, fall victim to this criticism. At the end of the paper I make a suggestion as to why Sosa's objection might not be as damaging as it at first seems
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ernest Sosa, Knowledge, and Understanding.Stephen R. Grimm - 2001 - Philosophical Studies 106 (3):171--191.
Reflective Knowledge and Epistemic Circularity.C. S. I. Jenkins - 2011 - Philosophical Papers 40 (3):305-325.
Reflective Knowledge: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge, Volume Ii.Ernest Sosa - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
Perceptual Knowledge and Epistemological Satisfaction.Barry G. Stroud - 2004 - In John Greco (ed.), Ernest Sosa and His Critics. Malden MA: Blackwell. pp. 165--173.
Relevant Alternatives, Contextualism Included.Ernest Sosa - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 119 (1-2):35-65.
A Virtue Epistemology: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge, Volume I.Ernest Sosa - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
Are There Two Grades of Knowledge?Ernest Sosa - 2003 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):113–130.
Reflective Knowledge: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge – Ernest Sosa.Guy Axtell - 2011 - Philosophical Quarterly 61 (242):203-205.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads69 ( #77,097 of 2,178,143 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #316,663 of 2,178,143 )
How can I increase my downloads?