Adynaton and material exclusion

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (2):165 – 190 (2008)
Abstract
Philosophical dialetheism, whose main exponent is Graham Priest, claims that some contradictions hold, are true, and it is rational to accept and assert them. Such a position is naturally portrayed as a challenge to the Law of Non-Contradiction (LNC). But all the classic formulations of the LNC are, in a sense, not questioned by a typical dialetheist, since she is (cheerfully) required to accept them by her own theory. The goal of this paper is to develop a formulation of the Law which appears to be unquestionable, in the sense that the Priestian dialetheist is committed to accept it without also accepting something inconsistent with it, on pain of trivialism—that is to say, on pain of lapsing into the position according to which everything is the case. This will be achieved via (a) a discussion of Priest's dialetheic treatment of the notions of rejection and denial; and (b) the characterization of a negation via the primitive intuition of content exclusion. Such a result will not constitute a cheap victory for the friends of consistency. We may just learn that different things have been historically conflated under the label of 'Law of Non-Contradiction'; that dialetheists rightly attack some formulations of the Law, and orthodox logicians and philosophers have been mistaken in assimilating them to the indisputable one.
Keywords Dialetheism  Law of Non-Contradiction  Assertion
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00048400801886199
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Change in View.Gilbert Harman - 1986 - MIT Press.

View all 37 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Absolute Contradiction, Dialetheism, and Revenge.Francesco Berto - 2014 - Review of Symbolic Logic 7 (2):193-207.
Shrieking, Just False and Exclusion.Gareth Young - 2015 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 4 (4):269-276.
Could Everything Be True? Probably Not.Matteo Plebani - 2015 - Philosophia 43 (2):499-504.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
A Dilemma for Dialetheism.Jason Zarri - 2010 - The Dualist 15 (Spring):21-31.
Doubt Truth to Be a Liar.Graham Priest - 2005 - Oxford University Press.
How to Sell a Contradiction.Francesco Berto - 2007 - College Publications.
Dialetheism.Francesco Berto & Graham Priest - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2008).
Conjunction and Contradiction.Achille C. Varzi - 2004 - In Graham Priest, J. C. Beall & Bradley Armour-Garb (eds.), The Law of Non-Contradiction: New Philosophical Essays. Clarendon Press. pp. 93–110.
Against Classical Dialetheism.Wenfang Wang - 2011 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (3):492-500.
Meaning, Metaphysics, and Contradiction.Francesco Berto - 2006 - American Philosophical Quarterly 43 (4):283-297.
The Law of Non-Contradiction as a Metaphysical Principle.Tuomas E. Tahko - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Logic 7:32-47.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
443 ( #5,249 of 2,191,825 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
33 ( #4,667 of 2,191,825 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature