Assessing presumptions in argumentation: Being a sound presumption vs. being presumably the case

Abstract

This paper is an attempt to identify and provide the normative conditions for presumptions and for presumptive inferences. Basically, the idea is adopting the distinction between epistemic and ontological qualifiers proposed in Bermejo-Luque in order to explain the difference between something being a correct presumption and something being presumably the case.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

My notes

Similar books and articles

Commentary on: Lilian Bermejo-Luque's "Assessing presumptions in argumentation: Being a sound presumpion vs. being presumably the case".Fred J. Kauffeld - unknown
Presumptive Reasoning in Interpretation. Implicatures and Conflicts of Presumptions.Fabrizio Macagno - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (2):233-265.
Presumptions in argument: Epistemic versus social approaches.David Godden & Harvey Siegel - unknown
Who is Presumed Innocent of What by Whom?Carl-Friedrich Stuckenberg - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (2):301-316.
Presumptions and the Distribution of Argumentative Burdens in Acts of Proposing and Accusing.Fred J. Kauffeld - 1997 - Argumentation 12 (2):245-266.
Reconstructing and assessing the conditions of meaningfulness. An argumentative approach to presupposition.Fabrizio Macagno - 2012 - In H. Ribeiro (ed.), Inside Arguments: Logic And The Study of Argumentation. Cambridge Scholars Press. pp. 247--268.
The epistemic relevance of social considerations in ordinary day-to-day presumptions.Fred J. Kauffeld - unknown
Presuming and Presumption in Everyday Argumentation: A response to Godden and Walton.Fred J. Kauffeld - unknown
Interpretative Disputes, Explicatures, and Argumentative Reasoning.Fabrizio Macagno & Alessandro Capone - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (4):399-422.
Presumption in legal argumentation: from antiquity to the middle ages.Hanns Hohmann - unknown
The public face of presumptions.Karen Petroski - 2008 - Episteme 5 (3):pp. 388-401.
Consider the source: One step in assessing premise acceptability. [REVIEW]James B. Freeman - 1996 - Argumentation 10 (4):453-460.
Presumptions in Legal Argumentation.Douglas Walton Fabrizio Macagno - 2012 - Ratio Juris 25 (3):271-300.
Presumptions in Legal Argumentation.Fabrizio Macagno & Douglas Walton - 2012 - Ratio Juris 25 (3):271-300.
The Account of Warrants in Bermejo-Luque’s Giving Reasons. [REVIEW]James B. Freeman - 2011 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 26 (3):311-320.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-02

Downloads
15 (#893,994)

6 months
7 (#350,235)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lilian Bermejo Luque
University of Granada

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

How to do things with words.John Langshaw Austin - 1962 - Oxford [Eng.]: Clarendon Press. Edited by Marina Sbisá & J. O. Urmson.
Studies in the way of words.Herbert Paul Grice - 1989 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 1962 - Proceedings of the British Academy 48:187-211.
A plea for excuses.John Austin - 1957 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 57:1--30.
Intention and convention in speech acts.Peter F. Strawson - 1964 - Philosophical Review 73 (4):439-460.

View all 15 references / Add more references