A randomised controlled trial to compare opt-in and opt-out parental consent for childhood vaccine safety surveillance using data linkage

Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (10):619-625 (2012)

Authors
James Berry
University of Tennessee, Memphis
Abstract
Introduction No consent for health and medical research is appropriate when the criteria for a waiver of consent are met, yet some ethics committees and data custodians still require informed consent. Methods A single-blind parallel-group randomised controlled trial: 1129 families of children born at a South Australian hospital were sent information explaining data linkage of childhood immunisation and hospital records for vaccine safety surveillance with 4 weeks to opt in or opt out by reply form, telephone or email. A subsequent telephone interview gauged the intent of 1026 parents (91%) in relation to their actions and the sociodemographic differences between participants and non-participants in each arm. Results The participation rate was 21% (n=120/564) in the opt-in arm and 96% (n=540/565) in the opt-out arm (χ2 (1 df) = 567.7, p<0.001). Participants in the opt-in arm were more likely than non-participants to be older, married/de facto, university educated and of higher socioeconomic status. Participants in the opt-out arm were similar to non-participants, except men were more likely to opt out. Substantial proportions did not receive, understand or properly consider study invitations, and opting in or opting out behaviour was often at odds with parents' stated underlying intentions. Conclusions The opt-in approach resulted in low participation and a biased sample that would render any subsequent data linkage unfeasible, while the opt-out approach achieved high participation and a representative sample. The waiver of consent afforded under current privacy regulations for data linkage studies meeting all appropriate criteria should be granted by ethics committees, and supported by data custodians. Trial registration number Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12610000332022
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2011-100145
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,195
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Some Limits of Informed Consent.O. O’Neill - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (1):4-7.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Can Consent Be Presumed?Govert den Hartogh - 2011 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (3):295-307.
Challenging the Status Quo.Dominic Wilkinson - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (2):235-237.
Normative Consent and Opt-Out Organ Donation.B. Saunders - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (2):84-87.
Opt-Out Organ Procurement and Tacit Consent.T. M. Wilkinson - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (2):74-75.
Parental Consent and the Use of Dead Children's Bodies.T. M. Wilkinson - 2001 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (4):337-358.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-04-20

Total views
184 ( #43,953 of 2,289,508 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #120,565 of 2,289,508 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature