Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (5):300-303 (1996)
The practical problem of assuaging the opponents of animal research may be solved without formally addressing (or resolving) the underlying ethical questions of the debate. Specifically, a peaceful boycott of the "fruits" of animal research may lead to a wider cessation of such research, than, say, vocal or even violent protest. To assist those who might wish to participate in such a boycott- and, moreover, to critically inform them of the implications of their actions-1 offer a modest proposal: the use of an "animal research advance directive", a form which enumerates precisely which "fruits of research" are declined
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Your Daughter or Your Dog? A Feminist Assessment of the Animal Research Issue.Deborah Slicer - 1991 - Hypatia 6 (1):108-124.
Animal Century: A Celebration of Changing Attitudes to Animals.Mark Gold - 1998 - J. Carpenter.
People Promoting and People Opposing Animal Rights: In Their Own Words.John M. Kistler - 2002 - Greenwood Press.
Animal Rights: A Subject Guide, Bibliography, and Internet Companion.John M. Kistler - 2000 - Greenwood Press.
The Universal Declaration of Animal Rights: Comments and Intentions.Georges Chapouthier & Jean-Claude Nouët (eds.) - 1998 - Ligue Française des Droits De L'Animal.
Animal Welfare and Animal Rights.L. W. Sumner - 1988 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (2):159-175.
Animal Liberation: The Definitive Classic of the Animal Movement.Peter Singer - 2009 - Ecco Book/Harper Perennial.
Added to index2010-09-13
Total downloads179 ( #24,224 of 2,152,643 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #162,806 of 2,152,643 )
How can I increase my downloads?