Abstract
In this work we will take up again the contributions of the feminist philosophy of science around androcentrism, with special emphasis on biology and biomedical sciences. We will propose that such contributions can be ordered according to three different senses of androcentrism, and that important tensions appear between these senses. Following the path traced by Longino, contextual critical empiricism, we will defend that the rational reconstruction of theories can help us to specify where patriarchal decision vectors crouch in scientific practice. To this end, we will present an alternative analysis to Longino’s and use it as an input to discuss the idea of type brains in the framework of the neuroendocrinology of behaviour.
Keywords androcentrism  androcentrismo  biology  biología  estructuralismo  feminism  feminismo  filosofía  philosophy  structuralist view of theories
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.22370/rhv2019iss14pp287-313
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,608
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Why Standpoint Matters.Alison Wylie - 2003 - In Robert Figueroa & Sandra G. Harding (eds.), Science and Other Cultures: Issues in Philosophies of Science and Technology. Routledge. pp. 26--48.
The Science Question in Feminism.Sandra Harding - 1988 - Hypatia 3 (1):157-168.
In Search Of Feminist Epistemology.Helen E. Longino - 1994 - The Monist 77 (4):472-485.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Mendus on Philosophy and Pervasiveness.Iddo Landau - 1997 - Philosophical Quarterly 47 (186):89–93.
Uncovering Gynocentric Science.Ruth Ginzberg - 1987 - Hypatia 2 (3):89-105.
Is There Androcentric Bias in Psychiatric Diagnosis?Sue V. Rosser - 1992 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (2):215-231.
The Semantic Conception and the Structuralist View of Theories: A Critique of Suppe’s Criticisms.Pablo Lorenzano - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (4):600-607.
Empirische Geometrie.Horst Struve - 1989 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 20 (2):325-339.
The Principles of Feminist Methodology.Deborah Charmaine Poff - 1988 - Dissertation, University of Guelph (Canada)
Whence Philosophy of Biology?Jason M. Byron - 2007 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (3):409-422.
Feminist Thought: Androcentrism, Communication, and Objectivity.Shefali Moitra - 2002 - Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers in Association with Centre of Advanced Study in Philosophy, Jadavpur University, Kolkata.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-12-30

Total views
4 ( #1,193,089 of 2,385,844 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #370,318 of 2,385,844 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes