A Unitary Schema for Arguments by Analogy

Informal Logic 32 (1):1-24 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Following a Toulmian account of argument analysis and evaluation, I offer a general unitary schema for, so called, deductive and inductive types of analogical arguments. This schema is able to explain why certain analogical arguments can be said to be deductive, and yet, also defeasible

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 98,293

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-19

Downloads
162 (#128,655)

6 months
28 (#116,431)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lilian Bermejo Luque
University of Granada

Citations of this work

Analogical Reasoning in Ethics.Georg Spielthenner - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (5):861-874.
Case-to-Case Arguments.Katharina Stevens - 2018 - Argumentation 32 (3):431-455.
Argument by Analogy in Ancient China.Yun Xie - 2019 - Argumentation 33 (3):323-347.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Logic and Conversation.H. Paul Grice - 2013 - In Maite Ezcurdia & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), The Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy. Peterborough, CA: Broadview Press. pp. 47.
Logic and Conversation.H. Paul Grice - 1975 - In Donald Davidson (ed.), The logic of grammar. Encino, Calif.: Dickenson Pub. Co.. pp. 64-75.
Metaphors We Live By.George Lakoff & Mark Johnson - 1980 - Ethics 93 (3):619-621.
Making it Explicit.Isaac Levi & Robert B. Brandom - 1996 - Journal of Philosophy 93 (3):145.

View all 24 references / Add more references