Being a Correct Presumption vs. Being Presumably the Case

Informal Logic 36 (1):1-25 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX


I argue for the distinction between presuming that p and maintaining that presumably p. In order to make sense of this distinction, I defend a non-inferentialist conception of presumptions and offer an account of the correctness conditions for both presumptions and presumptive inferences. I characterize presumptions as a type of constative speech-act having certain semantic correctness conditions. In turn, regarding presumptive inferences, my strategy is to provide the correctness conditions for the use of an epistemic modal such as “presumably.” This epistemic modal is characterized as a force indicator for speech-acts of concluding in complex speech-acts of arguing involving presumptive inferences.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,389

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Public Face of Presumptions.Karen Petroski - 2008 - Episteme 5 (3):pp. 388-401.
Moral Realism, Face-Values and Presumptions.Neil Sinclair - 2012 - Analytic Philosophy 53 (2):158-179.
Who is Presumed Innocent of What by Whom?Carl-Friedrich Stuckenberg - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (2):301-316.
Is Practical Reasoning Presumptive?Christian Kock - 2007 - Informal Logic 27 (1):91-108.


Added to PP

17 (#634,134)

6 months
1 (#415,900)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lilian Bermejo Luque
University of Granada