Bell's theorem and the nature of reality

Foundations of Physics 20 (10):1191-1212 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We rediscuss the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox in Bohm's spin version and oppose to it Bohr's controversial point of view. Then we explain Bell's theorem, Bell inequalities, and its consequences. We describe the experiment of Aspect, Dalibard, and Roger in detail. Finally we draw attention to the nonlocal structure of the underlying theory

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf01889465

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Bell's theorem based on a generalized EPR criterion of reality.Philippe H. Eberhard & Philippe Rosselet - 1995 - Foundations of Physics 25 (1):91-111.
Can Bell’s Prescription for Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?Joy Christian - unknown
The Bell Theorem as a Special Case of a Theorem of Bass.Karl Hess & Walter Philipp - 2005 - Foundations of Physics 35 (10):1749-1767.
Bell’s Theorem without Inequalities and without Unspeakable Information.Adán Cabello - 2005 - Foundations of Physics 35 (11):1927-1934.
Non-Local Realistic Theories and the Scope of the Bell Theorem.Federico Laudisa - 2008 - Foundations of Physics 38 (12):1110-1132.
Quantum: Einstein, Bohr, and the great debate about the nature of reality.Manjit Kumar - 2008 - Gurgaon: Hachette India.
Locality and Bell's Theorem.W. De Baere, A. Mann & M. Revzen - 1999 - Foundations of Physics 29 (1):67-77.
Local Causality and Completeness: Bell vs. Jarrett. [REVIEW]Travis Norsen - 2009 - Foundations of Physics 39 (3):273-294.
Non-separability Does Not Relieve the Problem of Bell’s Theorem.Joe Henson - 2013 - Foundations of Physics 43 (8):1008-1038.
The Scope and Generality of Bell’s Theorem.James Owen Weatherall - 2013 - Foundations of Physics 43 (9):1153-1169.
Against 'Realism'.Travis Norsen - 2007 - Foundations of Physics 37 (3):311-340.
Interpretation of the quantum formalism and Bell's theorem.Emilio Santos - 1991 - Foundations of Physics 21 (2):221-241.
Bell’s Theorem: Two Neglected Solutions.Louis Vervoort - 2013 - Foundations of Physics 43 (6):769-791.
EPR and Bell's theorem: A critical review. [REVIEW]Henry P. Stapp - 1991 - Foundations of Physics 21 (1):1-23.
Going Beyond Bell's Theorem.Daniel M. Greenberger, Michael A. Horne & Anton Zeilenger - 1989 - In Menas Kafatos (ed.), Bell’s Theorem, Quantum Theory and Conceptions of the Universe. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 69--72.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
92 (#182,136)

6 months
2 (#1,263,261)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The philosophy of quantum mechanics.Max Jammer - 1974 - New York,: Wiley. Edited by Max Jammer.
Beables for quantum field theory.J. S. Bell - 1987 - In Basil J. Hiley & D. Peat (eds.), Quantum Implications: Essays in Honour of David Bohm. Methuen. pp. 227--234.

View all 10 references / Add more references