Synthese 105 (1):115 - 121 (1995)
InWord and Object W. V. Quine argues that there is no uniquely correct way to assign referents to the terms of a language; any claim about the reference of a term is implicitly relative to a manual of translation. To Rudolf Carnap this must have seemed familiar. BeforeWord and Object was written Carnap had been saying the same thing inMeaning and Necessity: under the assumption of the method of the name-relation, any claim about the reference of a term is implicitly relative to what Carnap calls a conception of the name-relation. Yet Carnap is often taken to be a victim of Quine's relativistic notion of reference. Drawing on Carnap's discussion of the name-relation inMeaning and Necessity, it is argued that Carnap's and Quine's views on reference are not so far apart as is usually perceived.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic.Rudolf Carnap - 1947 - University of Chicago Press.
Quine and Analytic Philosophy: The Language of Language.George D. Romanos - 1983 - MIT Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
On Washing the Fur Without Wetting It: Quine, Carnap, and Analyticity.Alexander George - 2000 - Mind 109 (433):1-24.
Carnap Versus Quine, or Aprioristic Versus Naturalized Epistemology, or a Lesson From Dispositions.Wolfgang Spohn - unknown
Rudolf Carnap, Logical Empiricist: Materials and Perspectives.Jaakko Hintikka (ed.) - 1975 - D. Reidel Pub. Co..
'Two Dogmas'--All Bark and No Bite? Carnap and Quine on Analyticity.Paul Gregory - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):633 - 648.
Two Dogmas'–All Bark and No Bite? Carnap and Quine on Analyticity.Paul A. Gregory - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):633–648.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads66 ( #79,981 of 2,172,658 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #325,028 of 2,172,658 )
How can I increase my downloads?