Metaphysica 14 (1):1-15 (2013)
Meta-ontology (in van Inwagen's sense) concerns the methodology of ontology, and a controversial meta-ontological issue is to what extent ontology can rely on linguistic analysis while establishing the furniture of the world. This paper discusses an argument advanced by some ontologists (I call them unifiers) against supporters of or coincident entities (I call them multipliers) and its meta-ontological import. Multipliers resort to Leibniz's Law to establish that spatiotemporally coincident entities a and b are distinct, by pointing at a predicate F () made true by a and false by b . Unifiers try to put multipliers in front of a dilemma: in attempting to introduce metaphysical differences on the basis of semantic distinctions, multipliers either (a) rest on a fallacy of verbalism, entailed by a trade-off between a de dicto and a de re reading of modal claims, or (b) beg the question against unifiers by having to assume the distinction between a and b beforehand. I shall rise a tu quoque, showing that unifiers couldn't even distinguish material objects (or events) from the spatiotemporal regions they occupy unless they also resorted to linguistic distinctions. Their methodological aim to emancipate themselves from linguistic analysis in ontological businesses is therefore problematic
|Keywords||Meta-ontology Sortalism Coincident Entities|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Yet Another Paper on the Supervenience Argument Against Coincident Entities.Theodore Sider - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (3):613-624.
Advertisement for the Ontology for Medicine.Jeremy R. Simon - 2010 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31 (5):333-346.
Meta-Relation and Ontology Closure in Conceptual Structure Theory.Philip H. P. Nguyen, Ken Kaneiwa, Dan R. Corbett & Minh-Quang Nguyen - 2009 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 17 (4):291-320.
The Ontology of Signs as Linguistic and Non-Linguistic Entities: A Cognitive Perspective.Prof A. V. Kravchenko - 2003 - In Kravchenko, Prof. A.V. (2003) the Ontology of Signs as Linguistic and Non-Linguistic Entities: A Cognitive Perspective. [Book Chapter].
Ontological Anti-Realism.David J. Chalmers - 2009 - In David John Chalmers, David Manley & Ryan Wasserman (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford University Press.
The Anatomy of the Image: Toward an Applied Onto-Psychiatry.James M. Fielding & Dirk Marwede - 2012 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (4):287-303.
Non-Arbitrariness of Composition and Particularism.Matja Potrc - 2002 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 63 (1):197-215.
Buridan's Logic and the Ontology of Modes.Gyula Klima - 1999 - In Sten Ebbesen & Russsell L. Friedman (eds.), Medieval Analyses in Language and Cognition. Royal Danish Academy. pp. 473-496.
There Are No Things That Are Musical Works.Ross Cameron - 2008 - British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (3):295-314.
Global Supervenience, Coincident Entities, and Anti-Individualism.Oron Shagrir - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 109 (2):171-96.
Added to index2012-08-01
Total downloads265 ( #11,730 of 2,151,990 )
Recent downloads (6 months)44 ( #5,896 of 2,151,990 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.