Journal of Cognition and Culture 14 (1-2):65-91 (2014)

Camouflage commonly refers to the ability to make something appear as different from what it actually is, or not to make it appear at all. This concept originates from biological studies to describe a range of strategies used by organisms to dissimulate their presence in the environment, but it is frequently borrowed by other semantic fields as it is possible to camouflage one’s position, intentions, opinion etc.: an interesting conceptual continuum between the multiple denotations of camouflage seems to emerge from the multiple homologies. Following this outlook, the first part of this paper aims at sketching out the main forms of camouflage as understood within their biological framework, insisting on the inferential dynamics underdetermined and allowing camouflage, making use of the concept of abduction as received from the Peircean heritage. The second part explores some of the most relevant occurrences of camouflage in dialectical and rhetorical perspectives. The third section aims at drawing the sums of the comparison between linguistic and biological camouflage, showing how strategies aimed at debunking verbal camouflage correspond to their respective countermeasures in biologically-intended camouflage.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/15685373-12342111
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,480
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception.Marc H. Bornstein - 1980 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 39 (2):203-206.
Logic and Conversation.H. Paul Grice - 1975 - In Maite Ezcurdia & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), The Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy. Broadview Press. pp. 47.
Language, Embodiment, and the Cognitive Niche.Andy Clark - 2006 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (8):370-374.

View all 30 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Biological Pluralism and Homology.Heather A. Jamniczky - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):687-698.
What's Wrong with the New Biological Essentialism.Marc Ereshefsky - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (5):674-685.
Sequential Learning and the Interaction Between Biological and Linguistic Adaptation in Language Evolution.Florencia Reali & Morten H. Christiansen - 2009 - Interaction Studiesinteraction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 10 (1):5-30.
Race: Biological Reality or Social Construct?Robin O. Andreasen - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):666.
A Realist Approach to Biological Events.Jens Harbecke - 2005 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 27 (3/4):491 - 507.
Reduction in Biology.Michael Ruse - 2001 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 10:43-50.


Added to PP index

Total views
8 ( #906,077 of 2,330,624 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #394,426 of 2,330,624 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes