Abstract |
Recently, many AI researchers and practitioners have embarked on research visions that involve doing AI for “Good”. This is part of a general drive towards infusing AI research and practice with ethical thinking. One frequent theme in current ethical guidelines is the requirement that AI be good for all, or: contribute to the Common Good. But what is the Common Good, and is it enough to want to be good? Via four lead questions, the concept of Ethics Pen-Testing identifies challenges and pitfalls when determining, from an AI point of view, what the Common Good is and how it can be enhanced by AI. The current paper reports on a first evaluation of EPT. EPT is applicable to various artefacts that have ethical impact, including designs for or implementations of specific AI technology, and requirements engineering methods for eliciting which ethical settings to build into AI. The current study focused on the latter type of artefact. In four independent sessions, participants with close but varying involvements in “AI and ethics” were asked to deconstruct a method that has been proposed for eliciting ethical values and choices in autonomous car technology, an online experiment modelled on the Trolley Problem. The results suggest that EPT is well-suited to this task: the remarks made by participants lent themselves well to being structured by the four lead questions of EPT, in particular, regarding the question what the problem is and about which stakeholders define it. As part of the problem definition, the need became apparent for thorough technical domain knowledge in discussions of AI and ethics. Thus, participants questioned the framing and the presuppositions inherent in the experiment and the discourse on autonomous cars that underlies the experiment. They transitioned from discussing a specific AI artefact to discussing its role in wider socio-technical systems. Results also illustrate to what extent and how the requirements engineering method forces us to not only have a discussion about which values to “build into” AI systems, the substantive building blocks of the Common Good, but also about how we want to have this discussion at all. Thus, it forces us to become explicit about how we conceive of democracy and the constitutional state and the procedural building blocks of the Common Good.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.29173/irie381 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect.Philippa Foot - 1967 - Oxford Review 5:5-15.
Moral Machines:Teaching Robots Right From Wrong: Teaching Robots Right From Wrong.Wendell Wallach & Colin Allen - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
Selbstfahrende Autos und Trolley-Probleme: Zum Aufrechnen von Menschenleben im Falle unausweichlicher Unfälle.Alexander Hevelke & Julian Nida-Rümelin - 2015 - Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft Und Ethik 19 (1):5-24.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Teaching the Common Good in Business Ethics: A Case Study Approach.Mark Ryan - 2018 - Journal of Business Ethics 147 (4):693-704.
Authority and the Common Good in the Social and Political Philosophy of Yves R. Simon.Sylvanus Iniobong Udoidem - 1985 - Dissertation, The Catholic University of America
Common Beauty and the Common Good.Maureen H. O'Connell - 2011 - Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics 31 (1):123-141.
The Common Good of Business: Addressing a Challenge Posed by «Caritas in Veritate». [REVIEW]Alejo José G. Sison & Joan Fontrodona - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 100 (S1):99-107.
Reconsidering the Common Good in a Business Context.Thomas O’Brien - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 85 (S1):25 - 37.
The Common Good of the Firm in the Aristotelian-Thomistic Tradition.Alejo José G. Sison & Joan Fontrodona - 2012 - Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (2):211-246.
Commons Organizing: Embedding Common Good and Institutions for Collective Action. Insights from Ethics and Economics.Laura Albareda & Alejo Jose G. Sison - 2020 - Journal of Business Ethics 166 (4):727-743.
The Time of Our Lives: The Ethics of Common Sense.Mortimer Jerome Adler - 1969 - Fordham University Press.
Similarities in Business and IT Professional Ethics: The Need for and Development of A Comprehensive Code of Ethics.Dinah Payne & Brett J. L. Landry - 2005 - Journal of Business Ethics 62 (1):73-85.
Common Good Leadership in Business Management: An Ethical Model From the Indian Tradition.John M. Alexander & Jane Buckingham - 2011 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 20 (4):317-327.
Common Good Leadership in Business Management: An Ethical Model From the Indian Tradition.Jane Buckingham John M. Alexander - 2011 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 20 (4):317-327.
The Common Good of the Firm and Humanistic Management: Conscious Capitalism and Economy of Communion.Sandrine Frémeaux & Grant Michelson - 2017 - Journal of Business Ethics 145 (4):701-709.
The Amazonian Rain Forest as an Environmental Test-Case for Renewal of the Ethics and Economics Dialogue Concerning the Common Good.Richard O. Randolph - 2003 - Dissertation, Graduate Theological Union
Customizable Ethics Settings for Building Resilience and Narrowing the Responsibility Gap: Case Studies in the Socio-Ethical Engineering of Autonomous Systems.Sadjad Soltanzadeh, Jai Galliott & Natalia Jevglevskaja - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (5):2693-2708.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-08-12
Total views
16 ( #665,402 of 2,506,014 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,628 of 2,506,014 )
2020-08-12
Total views
16 ( #665,402 of 2,506,014 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,628 of 2,506,014 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads