Episteme:1-18 (forthcoming)

Authors
Jacob Busch
University of Aarhus
Abstract
Studies in experimental philosophy claim to document intuition variation. Some studies focus on demographic group-variation; Colaço et al., for example, claim that age generates intuition variation regarding knowledge attribution in a fake-barn scenario. Other studies claim to show intuition variation when comparing the intuition of philosophers to that of non-philosophers. The main focus has been on documenting intuition variation rather than uncovering what underlying factor may prompt such a phenomenon. We explore a number of suggested explanatory hypotheses put forth by Colaço et al., as well as an attempt to test Sosa's claim that intuition variance is a result of people ‘filling in the details’ of a thought experiment differently from one another. We show that people respond consistently across conditions aimed at ‘filling in the details’ of thought experiments, that risk attitude does not seem relevant to knowledge ascription, that people's knowledge ascriptions do not vary due to views about defeasibility of knowledge. Yet, we find no grounds to reject that a large proportion of people appear to adhere to so-called subjectivism about knowledge, which may explain why they generally have intuitions about the fake-barn scenario that vary from those of philosophers.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/epi.2021.12
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,077
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Unreflective Epistemology.Christoph9 Kelp - 2014 - Episteme 11 (4):411-422.
Epistemic Luck and Epistemic Risk.Jesús Navarro - forthcoming - Erkenntnis:1-22.
Fake Barns and Our Epistemological Theorizing.Ángel García Rodríguez - 2018 - Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía 50 (148):29-53.
Rational Intuition: Bealer on its Nature and Epistemic Status.Ernest Sosa - 1996 - Philosophical Studies 81 (2-3):151--162.
Is Intuition Central in Philosophy?Tinghao Wang - 2016 - Philosophical Forum 47 (3-4):281-296.
The Argument From Variation Against Using One’s Own Intuitions As Evidence.Esther Goh - 2019 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 56 (2):95-110.
Intuitions as Invitations.Patrick Fleming - 2015 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 11 (1):23-36.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-05-20

Total views
24 ( #457,268 of 2,454,575 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #38,442 of 2,454,575 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes