Journal of Philosophical Research 22:145-179 (1997)
While neither Hegel nor Marx can be called “ecologists” in any strict sense of the term, they both present views of the human-nature relationship which offer important insights for contemporary debates in philosophical ecology. Further, while Marx and Engels began a tradition of sharply distinguishing their own views of nature from those of Hegel, careful examination reveals a substantial commonality of sentiment. The essay compares Hegel and Marx (and Engels) in terms of their basic conceptions of nature, their critiques of Romanitic nature-worship, their notions of how a meaningful unity with nature requires the act of socially transforming nature, their respective calls for a new science of nature, and their attitudes towards technology. I argue that we can uncover a largely shared humanistic orientation toward nature, and I situate this view within contemporary debates about the anthropocentric or non-anthropocentric foundation of ecological thinking
|Keywords||Contemporary Philosophy General Interest|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Marx's Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Nature.John L. Stanley - 1997 - Science and Society 61 (4):449 - 473.
On Recovering Marx After Marxism.Tom Rockmore - 2000 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (4):95-106.
The Concept of Nature and Historicism in Marx.Zhang Wenxi - 2006 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (4):630-642.
Hegel's Philosophy of Nature: Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences , Part Ii.A. V. Miller (ed.) - 2004 - Clarendon Press.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads40 ( #126,321 of 2,153,864 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #184,428 of 2,153,864 )
How can I increase my downloads?