In Ivan Pozzoni (ed.), Frammenti di filosofia contemporanea. Limina Mentis. pp. 111-135 (2015)
AbstractAn overview of the recent debate on the Trinity in the analytic philosophy of religion. I move from putting forward the Logical Problem of the Trinity (LPT) according to R.Cartwright and M.Rea. I then define two useful notions in order to evaluate the interpretive force of the mainstream approaches to answer LPT; i.e. , be X a concept, I define maximally robust reading of X and sufficiently robust reading of X. In the subsequent section, I offer an expository analysis of Latin Trinitarianism, Social Trinitarianism and Material Constitution Trinitarianism in line with such concepts. I finally advance some reasons why neither of these properly work. My main argument is that every traditional phrasing of the doctrine of the Trinity asks Christians to hold maximally robust reading both of the onefoldness of God and the threefoldness of Divine Persons. Now, while Latin Trinitarianism, Social Trinitarianism and Material Constitution Trinitarianism provide maximally robust account of God's onefoldness, they can't give a maximally robust account for Persons' threefoldness.
Similar books and articles
The Problem with Social Trinitarianism: A Reply to Wierenga.Jeffrey E. Brower - 2004 - Faith and Philosophy 21 (3):295-303.
Material Constitution and the Trinity.Jeffrey E. Brower & Michael C. Rea - 2005 - Faith and Philosophy 22 (1):57-76.
On Behalf of Classical Trinitarianism: A Critique on Rahner on the Trinity.Phillip Cary - 1992 - The Thomist 56 (3):365 - 405.
A Supervenient Trinity: An Alternative to Latin and Social Trinitarian Theories.Matthew Zaro Fisher - 2015 - Heythrop Journal 56 (5):964-973.
Indexicals and the Trinity: Two Non-Social Models.Scott M. Williams - 2013 - Journal of Analytic Theology 1:74-94.
Does the Problem of Material Constitution Illuminate the Doctrine of the Trinity?William Lane Craig - 2005 - Faith and Philosophy 22 (1):77-86.
On Communitarian Divinity: An African Interpretation of the Trinity.A. Okechukwu Ogbonnaya - 1994 - Paragon House Publishers.
Hegel, the Trinity, and the ‘I’.Paolo Diego Bubbio - 2014 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 76 (2):129-150.
The Whole Truth: Hegel’s Reconceptualization of Trinity.Dale M. Schlitt - 1984 - The Owl of Minerva 15 (2):169-182.
Ontology, belief, and the doctrine of the trinity.Leroy T. Howe - 1981 - Sophia 20 (1):5 - 16.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Lineamenti di cristeologia. «Fede critica» e umiltà epistemica: il rapporto ragione-fede al confine tra meta-teologia, metodologia e vita.Damiano Migliorini - 2017 - TheoLogica: An International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and Philosophical Theology 1 (1):94-147.
References found in this work
The unfinished business of trinitarian theorizing.Dale Tuggy - 2003 - Religious Studies 39 (2):165-183.