Justification Without Awareness: A Defense of Epistemic Externalism

Oxford University Press (2006)
Authors
Michael Bergmann
Purdue University
Abstract
Virtually all philosophers agree that for a belief to be epistemically justified, it must satisfy certain conditions. Perhaps it must be supported by evidence. Or perhaps it must be reliably formed. Or perhaps there are some other "good-making" features it must have. But does a belief's justification also require some sort of awareness of its good-making features? The answer to this question has been hotly contested in contemporary epistemology, creating a deep divide among its practitioners. Internalists, who tend to focus on scientific or theoretical beliefs as the ideal, insist that such awareness is required for justification. Externalists, who think children's ordinary beliefs in obvious facts are paradigm cases of justified belief, say it isn't required. Michael Bergmann's book offers a decisive refutation of internalism and a sustained defense of externalism
Keywords Externalism (Philosophy of mind  Philosophy of mind  Knowledge, Theory of  Individualism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2009
Buy the book $30.00 used (60% off)   $67.00 new (11% off)   $75.00 direct from Amazon    Amazon page
Call number BD418.3.B46 2006
ISBN(s) 0199275742   9780199275748   9780199562428  
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,013
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Moore's Paradox and the Accessibility of Justification.Declan Smithies - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (2):273-300.
Why Open-Minded People Should Endorse Dogmatism.Chris Tucker - 2010 - Philosophical Perspectives 24 (1):529-545.
Epistemic Entitlement.Peter J. Graham - 2012 - Noûs 46 (3):449-482.
Unreasonable Knowledge.Maria Lasonen-Aarnio - 2010 - Philosophical Perspectives 24 (1):1-21.

View all 108 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Access Externalism.John Gibbons - 2006 - Mind 115 (457):19-39.
Reidian Externalism.Michael Bergmann - 2008 - In Vincent Hendricks (ed.), New Waves in Epistemology. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Epistemic Internalism.Bjc Madison - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (10):840-853.
Prospects for Epistemic Compatibilism.Sven Bernecker - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 130 (1):81-104.
The Chimerical Appeal of Epistemic Externalism.Joe Cruz & John Pollock - 2004 - In Richard Schantz (ed.), The Externalist Challenge. De Gruyter. pp. 125--42.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
147 ( #43,353 of 2,312,518 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #80,864 of 2,312,518 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature