- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Legal and Ethical Complexities of Consent with Cognitively Impaired Research Subjects: Proposed Guidelines
Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 24 (1):18-35 (1996)
Abstract
When science takes man as its subject, tensions arise between two values basic to Western society: freedom of scientific inquiry and protection of individual inviolability.... At the heart of this conflict lies an age-old question: When may a society, actively or by acquiescence, expose some of its members to harm in order to seek benefits for them, for others, or for society as a whole?My notes
Similar books and articles
Legal and Ethical Complexities of Consent with Cognitively Impaired Research Subjects: Proposed Guidelines.Jessica Wilen Berg - 1996 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 24 (1):18-35.
Comprehending the Distinctively Sexual Nature of the Conduct.Jami L. Anderson - 2010 - Sex, Drugs and Rock and Roll.
A survey of researchers using a consent policy for cognitively impaired human research subjects.Philip J. Candilis, Robert W. Wesley & Alison Wichman - 1993 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 15 (6):1.
Re-consenting human subjects: ethical, legal and practical issues.D. B. Resnik - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (11):656-657.
Informed consent, exploitation and whether it is possible to conduct human subjects research without either one.Dave Wendler - 2000 - Bioethics 14 (4):310–339.
On the need for improved protections of incapacitated and non-benefiting research subjects.Stefan Eriksson - 2010 - Bioethics 26 (1):15-21.
Protecting Human Subjects in Internet Research.Larry Pace & Mary Livingston - 2005 - Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies 10 (1):35-41.
Confirming Older Adult Patients' Views of Who They Are and Would Like To Be.Ingrid Randers, Tina H. Olson & Anne-Cathrine Mattiasson - 2002 - Nursing Ethics 9 (4):416-431.
Questionable Research Practices Compel Subjects to Join Studies.David Resnik - 2007 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 30 (29).
Morally Relevant Similarities and Differences Between Children and Dementia Patients as Research Subjects: Representation in Legal Documents and Ethical Guidelines.Karin Jongsma, Wendy Bos & Suzanne Vathorst - 2015 - Bioethics 29 (9):662-670.
A Policy in Flux: New York State's Evolving Approach to Human Subjects Research Involving Individuals Who Lack Consent Capacity.Valerie Gutmann Koch - 2014 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 42 (3):383-388.
Rawls and research on cognitively impaired patients: A reply to Maio.Derek R. Bell - 2003 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (5):381-393.
Research on human subjects: ethics, law, and social policy.David N. Weisstub (ed.) - 1998 - Kidlington, Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
The role and responsibilities of witnesses in the informed consent process.Veronika Wirtz Angélica R. Ángeles‐Llerenas - 2009 - Developing World Bioethics 9 (1):18-25.
Informed Consent and Deception in Psychological Research?Philippe Patry - 2001 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 14 (1):34-38.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-02-04
Downloads
8 (#1,249,165)
6 months
1 (#1,459,555)
2016-02-04
Downloads
8 (#1,249,165)
6 months
1 (#1,459,555)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Innovation in Human Research Protection: The AbioCor Artificial Heart Trial.E. Haavi Morreim, George E. Webb, Harvey L. Gordon, Baruch Brody, David Casarett, Ken Rosenfeld, James Sabin, John D. Lantos, Barry Morenz, Robert Krouse & Stan Goodman - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (5):W6-W16.
Inconsistent Approaches to Research Involving Cognitively Impaired Adults: Why the Broad View of Substituted Judgment Is Our Best Guide.Mark Yarborough - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (10):66-67.
Decisionally Impaired Persons in Research: Refining the Proposed Refinements.Evan G. DeRenzo - 1997 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 25 (2-3):139-149.
Decisionally Impaired Persons in Research: Refining the Proposed Refinements.Evan G. DeRenzo - 1997 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 25 (2-3):139-149.
References found in this work
Informed Consent: Legal Theory and Clinical Practice.Paul S. Appelbaum, Charles W. Lidz & Alan Meisel - 1987 - Oxford University Press USA.
Proposed guidelines for the participation of persons with dementia as research subjects.Edward W. Keyserlingk, Kathleen Glass, Sandra Kogan & Serge Gauthier - 1995 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 38 (2):319.
Success in Spite of Failure: Why IRBs Falter in Reviewing Risks and Benefits.Peter C. Williams - 1984 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 6 (3):1.
Taking Consent Seriously: IRB Intervention in the Consent Process.John A. Robertson - 1982 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 4 (5):1.
Protecting Human Subjects from Harm through Improved Risk Judgments.Eric M. Meslin - 1990 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 12 (1):7.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-4c2ch uwo