Canadian Journal of Philosophy 48 (2):200-222 (2018)

Authors
Sharon Berry
Oakland University
Abstract
Since Benacerraf’s ‘What Numbers Could Not Be, ’ there has been a growing interest in mathematical structuralism. An influential form of mathematical structuralism, modal structuralism, uses logical possibility and second order logic to provide paraphrases of mathematical statements which don’t quantify over mathematical objects. These modal structuralist paraphrases are a useful tool for nominalists and realists alike. But their use of second order logic and quantification into the logical possibility operator raises concerns. In this paper, I show that the work of both these elements can be done by a single natural generalization of the logical possibility operator.
Keywords nominalism  Hellman  philosophy of math  logical possibility  potentialism  second order logic  modal structuralism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2018
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/00455091.2017.1344502
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

On the Plurality of Worlds.David Lewis - 1986 - Wiley-Blackwell.
Modal Logic as Metaphysics.Timothy Williamson - 2013 - Oxford University Press.
Saving Truth From Paradox.Hartry Field - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
On the Plurality of Worlds.David Lewis - 1986 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 178 (3):388-390.
Realism, Mathematics and Modality.Hartry Field - 1988 - Philosophical Topics 16 (1):57-107.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Can All Things Be Counted?Chris Scambler - forthcoming - Journal of Philosophical Logic:1-28.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What Numbers Could Be (and, Hence, Necessarily Are).Mark Eli Kalderon - 1996 - Philosophia Mathematica 4 (3):238-255.
Three Varieties of Mathematical Structuralism.Geoffrey Hellman - 2001 - Philosophia Mathematica 9 (2):184-211.
Modal Structuralism and Theism.Silvia Jonas - forthcoming - In Fiona Ellis (ed.), New Models of Religious Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
A Simplified Embedding of E Into Monomodal K.Rohan French - 2009 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 17 (4):421-428.
Naturalism and Modal Reasoning.Nenad Miščević - 1994 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 49 (1):149-173.
Naturalism and Modal Reasoning.Nenad Miščević - 1994 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 49 (1):149-173.
A Scholastic-Realist Modal-Structuralism.Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen - 2014 - Philosophia Scientiae 18:127-138.
Who Needs Mereology?Stephen Pollard - 1997 - Philosophia Mathematica 5 (1):65-70.
Mathematical Structuralism Today.Julian C. Cole - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (8):689-699.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-07-07

Total views
105 ( #99,445 of 2,438,799 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #42,982 of 2,438,799 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes