Philosophical Studies 175 (9):2285-2308 (2018)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
In this paper, I will attempt to develop and defend a common form of intuitive resistance to the companions in guilt argument. I will argue that one can reasonably believe there are promising solutions to the access problem for mathematical realism that don’t translate to moral realism. In particular, I will suggest that the structuralist project of accounting for mathematical knowledge in terms of some form of logical knowledge offers significant hope of success while no analogous approach offers such hope for moral realism.
|
| Keywords | access problem Benacerraf problem companions in guilt companions in innocence |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| ISBN(s) | |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11098-017-0959-5 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value.Sharon Street - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 127 (1):109-166.
Anti-Exceptionalism About Logic.Ole Thomassen Hjortland - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (3):631-658.
View all 20 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Coincidence Avoidance and Formulating the Access Problem.Sharon E. Berry - 2020 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 50 (6):687-701.
Similar books and articles
Good News for Moral Error Theorists: A Master Argument Against Companions in Guilt Strategies.Christopher Cowie - 2016 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 94 (1):115-130.
Why Companions in Guilt Arguments Won't Work.C. Cowie - 2014 - Philosophical Quarterly 64 (256):407-422.
Rescuing Companions in Guilt Arguments.Richard Rowland - forthcoming - Philosophical Quarterly:pqv070.
Moral Disagreement, Anti-Realism, and the Worry About Overgeneralization.Thomas Pölzler - 2015 - In Christian Kanzian, Josef Mitterer & Katharina Neges (eds.), Contributions to the 38th International Wittgenstein Symposium. pp. 245-247.
Companions in Guilt: Arguments for Ethical Objectivity – Hallvard Lillehammer.Andrew Fisher - 2009 - Philosophical Quarterly 59 (235):379-382.
Bad News for Moral Error Theorists: There Is No Master Argument Against Companions in Guilt Strategies.Ramon Das - 2017 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 95 (1):58-69.
A Unique Metaphysical Problem for Moral Realism.Brian Collins - 2013 - Southwest Philosophy Review 29 (1):257-265.
Gδ‐Pieces of Canonical Partitions of G‐Spaces.Barbara Majcher-Iwanow - 2005 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 51 (5):450-461.
Collective Guilt and Collective Guilt Feelings.Margaret Gilbert - 2002 - The Journal of Ethics 6 (2):115-143.
Shame, Guilt and Morality.Fabrice Teroni & Otto Bruun - 2011 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (2):223-245.
Guilt and Child Soldiers.Krista K. Thomason - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (1):115-127.
Anti-Reductionism and Supervenience.Michael Ridge - 2007 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (3):330-348.
The Companions in Guilt Strategy.Hallvard Lillehammer - 2013 - In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Ethics.
Why Companions in Guilt Arguments Still Work: Reply to Cowie.Ramon Das - forthcoming - Philosophical Quarterly:pqv078.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2017-08-15
Total views
139 ( #72,134 of 2,427,504 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #37,340 of 2,427,504 )
2017-08-15
Total views
139 ( #72,134 of 2,427,504 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #37,340 of 2,427,504 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
