Naturalized Sense Data

This paper examines and defends the view that the immediate objects of visual perception, or what are often called sense data, are parts of the facing surfaces of physical objects-the naturalized sense data theory. Occasionally defended in the literature on the philosophy of perception, most famously by G. E. Moore , it has not proved popular and indeed was abandoned by Moore himself. The contemporary situation in the philosophy of perception seems ripe for a revaluation of the NSD theory. however. The NSD theory allows us to accommodate the very real shortcomings in uncritical direct realism without postulating the existence of non-physical sense data in a way that has seemed to many incompatible with any robust form of philosophical naturalism.The argument to establish the NSD theory proceeds in two stages. In §II I argue against the direct realist that we perceive three-dimensional material objects in virtue of perceiving parts of their surfaces. The argument for this conclusion involves clearly distinguishing between two notions that have tended to be run together in discussions of perception---namely, immediate perception and direct perception. In §III I argue against the sense-datum theorist that those parts of the surfaces of those objects are not themselves perceived in virtue of the perception of anything else
Keywords Epistemology  Perception  Sense Data  Vision
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2653655
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,798
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Lessons From Beyond Vision (Sounds and Audition).Casey O'Callaghan - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 153 (1):143-160.
In Defense of Relational Direct Realism.Kenneth Hobson - 2013 - European Journal of Philosophy 21 (4):550-574.
Hearing Properties, Effects or Parts?Casey O'Callaghan - 2011 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (3pt3):375-405.
XIII-Hearing Properties, Effects or Parts?Casey O'Callaghan - 2011 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (3pt3):375-405.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Primary Objects of Perception.David H. Sanford - 1976 - Mind 85 (April):189-208.
Sense-Data.Michael Huemer - 2005 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Sense Data: The Sensible Approach.Manuel Garcia-Carpintero - 2001 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 62 (1):17-63.
The Argument From the Hand.Peter T. Cash - 1979 - Philosophical Investigations 2 (4):47-70.
Experience And The Objects Of Perception.Leonard S. Carrier - 1981 - Washington: University Press Of America.
Common Sense and Berkeley's Perception by Suggestion.Jody Graham - 1997 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (3):397 – 423.
Perception.Howard M. Robinson - 1994 - New York: Routledge.
G.E. Moore's Theory of Sense-Data.Virginia Presson - 1951 - Journal of Philosophy 48 (January):34-41.
The Role of Surfaces in an Ecological Theory of Perception.Avrum Stroll - 1986 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 46 (March):437-453.
The Common‐Sense View of Physical Objects.Timothy L. S. Sprigge - 1966 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 9 (1-4):339-373.
The Role of Sense-Data in Perception.N. Mishra - 1960 - Philosophical Quarterly (India) 33 (April):41-48.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

149 ( #32,018 of 2,177,988 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

6 ( #45,332 of 2,177,988 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums