On the Value of Scientific Knowledge

Authors
Lars Bergström
Stockholm University
Abstract
Presumably, most scientists believe that scientific knowledge is intrinsically good, i.e. good in itself, apart from consequences. This doctrine should be rejected. The arguments which are usually given for it — e.g. by philosophers like W.D. Ross, R. Brandt, and W. Frankena — are quite inconclusive. In particular, it may be doubted whether knowledge is in fact desired for its own sake, and even i f it is, this would not support the doctrine. However, the doctrine is open to counter-examples. The main counter-argument is that the doctrine has implications which are morally unacceptable
Keywords Analytic Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/gps1987306
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,097
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Scientific Value.Lars Bergström - 1996 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (3):189-202.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Post-Modernism, a French Cultural Chernobyl: Foucault on Power/Knowledge.Robert Nola - 1994 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 37 (1):3 – 43.
A Contextualist Solution to the Problem of Easy Knowledge.Ram Neta - 2005 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 69 (1):183-206.
In What Sense Is Scientific Knowledge Collective Knowledge?Hyundeuk Cheon - 2014 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 44 (4):407-423.
The Doctrine of the Eject: III. The Doctrine of Instinctive Knowledge.George Stuart Fullerton - 1907 - Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 4 (23):617-623.
The Analogy Argument for a Limited Acccount of Omniscience.Jonathan Kvanvig - 1989 - International Philosophical Quarterly 29 (2):129-138.
Aristotle on the Akratic's Knowledge.Filip Grgić - 2002 - Phronesis 47 (4):336-358.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-04-04

Total views
60 ( #114,567 of 2,313,458 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #549,067 of 2,313,458 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature