Processing demands associated with relational complexity: Testing predictions with dual-task methodologies

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):832-833 (1998)
Abstract
We discuss how modified dual-task approaches may be used to verify the degree to which cognitive tasks are capacity demanding. We also delineate some of the complexities associated with the use of the “double easy-to-hard” paradigm for testing claim of Halford, Wilson & Phillips that hierarchical reasoning imposes processing demands equivalent to those of transitive reasoning.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X98231761
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,655
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Flexible Neural Circuitry in Word Processing.Michael I. Posner & Gregory J. DiGirolamo - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):299-300.
Complexity: From Formal Analysis to Final Action.Douglas Frye & Philip David Zelazo - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):836-837.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

6 ( #553,284 of 2,158,204 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #356,322 of 2,158,204 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums