Poverty of the Stimulus Revisited

Cognitive Science 35 (7):1207-1242 (2011)
Abstract
A central goal of modern generative grammar has been to discover invariant properties of human languages that reflect “the innate schematism of mind that is applied to the data of experience” and that “might reasonably be attributed to the organism itself as its contribution to the task of the acquisition of knowledge” (Chomsky, 1971). Candidates for such invariances include the structure dependence of grammatical rules, and in particular, certain constraints on question formation. Various “poverty of stimulus” (POS) arguments suggest that these invariances reflect an innate human endowment, as opposed to common experience: Such experience warrants selection of the grammars acquired only if humans assume, a priori, that selectable grammars respect substantive constraints. Recently, several researchers have tried to rebut these POS arguments. In response, we illustrate why POS arguments remain an important source of support for appeal to a priori structure-dependent constraints on the grammars that humans naturally acquire
Keywords Statistics  Language acquisition  Linguistics  Syntax
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01189.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,786
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Rules and Representations.Noam A. Chomsky - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (127):1-61.

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Simple is Not Easy.Edison Barrios - 2016 - Synthese 193 (7):2261-2305.
The Evolution of Linguistic Rules.Matthew Spike - 2017 - Biology and Philosophy 32 (6):887-904.
Complexity in Language Acquisition.Alexander Clark & Shalom Lappin - 2013 - Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (1):89-110.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Poverty of the Stimulus Argument.Stephen Laurence & Eric Margolis - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (2):217-276.
Innateness and Moral Psychology.Shaun Nichols - 2005 - In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents. New York: Oxford University Press New York. pp. 353--369.
Brass Tacks in Linguistic Theory: Innate Grammatical Principles.Stephen Grain, Andrea Gualmini & Paul Pietroski - 2005 - In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen P. Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents. New York: Oxford University Press New York. pp. 1--175.
Nature, Nurture, and Universal Grammar.Stephen Crain & Paul M. Pietroski - 2001 - Linguistics and Philosophy 24 (2):139-186.
The Poverty of the Moral Stimulus.John Mikhail - 2008 - In Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Moral Psychology Volume 1. MIT Press.
Nature, Nurture and Universal Grammar.Paul Pietrowski - 2001 - Linguistics and Philosophy 24 (2):139 - 186.
Added to PP index
2011-08-09

Total downloads
195 ( #25,927 of 2,231,512 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #32,220 of 2,231,512 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature