Slurs, synonymy, and taboo

Australasian Journal of Philosophy (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The ‘prohibitionist’ idea that slurs have the same linguistic properties as their neutral counterparts hasn’t received much support in the literature. Here I offer a modified version of prohibitionism, according to which the taboo on using slurs is part of their conventional meaning. I conclude with explanations of the behaviour of slurs in embedded constructions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Slurs, Synonymy, and Taboo.Y. Sandy Berkovski - 2023 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 101 (2):423-439.
Slurs.Adam M. Croom - 2011 - Language Sciences 33:343-358.
Slurs and Redundancy.Y. Sandy Berkovski - 2022 - Philosophia 50 (4):1607-1622.
Bad Words: Philosophical Perspectives on Slurs.David Sosa (ed.) - 2018 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Cognitive Synonymy: A General Overview.Maja Stanojevic - 2009 - Facta Universitatis, Series: Linguistics and Literature 7 (2):193-200.
Slurs under quotation.Stefan Rinner & Alexander Hieke - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 179 (5):1483-1494.
Slurs and Toxicity.Jesse Rappaport - 2020 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 97 (1):177-202.
Not all slurs are equal.Mihaela Popa-Wyatt - 2016 - Phenomenology and Mind 11:150-156.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-06

Downloads
28 (#571,976)

6 months
12 (#218,039)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Y. Sandy Berkovski
Bilkent University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references