The ethics of belief: Conservative belief management

Social Epistemology 20 (1):67 – 78 (2006)
Some hold that W.K. Clifford's arguments are inconsistent, appealing to the disvalue of likely consequences of nonevidential belief-formation, while also insisting that the consequences are irrelevant to the wrongness of so believing. My thesis is that Clifford's arguments are consistent; one simply needs to be clear on the role consequences play in the "Ethics of Belief" (and, for that matter, in William James's "The Will to Believe"). The consequences of particular episodes of nonevidential belief-formation are, as Clifford insists, irrelevant to the epistemic, and so moral, status of believing. The moral matter is that adopting a policy of nonevidential belief-formation constitutes commitment to antithetical principles, viz. (i) our antecedent moral obligation to minimize the risk of harming ourselves and others and (ii) the flagrant disregard for (i) entailed by employing a policy of risk, i.e. nonevidentialism. Clifford's arguments should be read as demonstrating that a nonevidentialist approach to belief-management constitutes the kind of risk that, in fact, is at odds with this antecedent moral obligation - hence the discussion of likely consequences, despite his claims that they are irrelevant to the moral status of the beliefs yielding them. They are irrelevant to the moral status of nonevidentialism but not irrelevant to the fact of risk. The moral impermissibility of nonevidentialism inheres in the inconsistency of it and our antecedent moral obligations, not in the value or disvalue of the particular consequences of that belief-management style.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/02691720500512291
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,224
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
``The Ethics of Belief".W. K. Clifford - 1999 - In The Ethics of Belief and Other Essays. Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books. pp. 70-97.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Ethics of Belief.Michael Lopresto - 2011 - Emergent Australasian Philosophers (4):9.
A Re-Evaluation of Clifford and His Critics.Brian Zamulinski - 2002 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 40 (3):437-457.
Belief in Kant.Andrew Chignell - 2007 - Philosophical Review 116 (3):323-360.
The Ethics of Belief.Andrew Chignell - 2016 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Belief Revision and Relevance.Peter Gardenfors - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:349 - 365.
The Virtues of Belief: Toward a Non-Evidentialist Ethics of Belief-Formation. [REVIEW]Richard Amesbury - 2008 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 63 (1/3):25 - 37.
Why Believe?John Cottingham - 2009 - Continuum.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
98 ( #53,608 of 2,192,001 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #289,023 of 2,192,001 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature