Abstract
Health authorities increasingly request that general practitioners use information and communication technologies such as electronic patient records for accountability purposes. This article deals with the use of EPRs among general practitioners in Britain. It examines two ways in which GPs use the EPR for accountability purposes. One way is to generate audit reports on the basis of the information that has been entered into the record. The other is to let the computer intervene in the clinical process through prompts. The article argues that GPs' ambivalence toward using the EPR makes them active in finding ways that turn the EPR into a meaningful tool for them, that is, a tool that helps them provide what they see as good care. The article's main contribution is to show how accountability and autonomy are coproduced; less professional autonomy does not follow from more requests to document one's work. Instead, new forms of autonomy are produced in the sociotechnical network that is made up by health policy and local engagements with patients and technology.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1177/0162243906293884
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,834
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Pandora’s Hope.Bruno Latour - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
On Technical Mediation.Bruno Latour - 1994 - Common Knowledge 3 (2):29-64.
Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences.Geoffrey C. Bowker & Susan Leigh Star - 2001 - Journal of the History of Biology 34 (1):212-214.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Electronic Petition as an Effective Tool for Political Participation of Citizens.A. K. Konstantynivska - 2018 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 1 (1-2):89-95.
The Hippocratic Bargain and Health Information Technology.Mark A. Rothstein - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (1):7-13.
The Challenge Posed by Autonomy in Medical Ethics.James Alan Branch - 2000 - Dissertation, Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary
Confidentiality and the Duties of Care.J. O'Brien - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (1):36-40.
Behind Closed Doors: Accountability and Responsibility in Patient Care.Virginia A. Sharpe - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (1):28 – 47.
Autonomy and Long-Term Care.George J. Agich - 1993 - Oxford University Press.
Autonomy, Wellbeing, and the Case of the Refusing Patient.Jukka Varelius - 2005 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 9 (1):117-125.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-11-26

Total views
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes