Two Problems for Proportionality about Omissions

Dialectica 68 (3):429-441 (2014)
Authors
Sara Bernstein
University of Notre Dame
Abstract
Theories of causation grounded in counterfactual dependence face the problem of profligate omissions: numerous irrelevant omissions count as causes of an outcome. A recent purported solution to this problem is proportionality, which selects one omission among many candidates as the cause of an outcome. This paper argues that proportionality cannot solve the problem of profligate omissions for two reasons. First: the determinate/determinable relationship that holds between properties like aqua and blue does not hold between negative properties like not aqua and not blue. Negative properties are those at stake in omissive causation. Second: proportionality misconstrues the nature of the problem to be solved
Keywords omissions  proportionality  determinates/ determinables  negative properties
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1746-8361.12071
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Mental Causation.Stephen Yablo - 1992 - Philosophical Review 101 (2):245-280.
Fundamental Determinables.Jessica M. Wilson - 2012 - Philosophers' Imprint 12.
Against Proportionality.L. Shapiro & E. Sober - 2012 - Analysis 72 (1):89-93.
Proportionality and Omissions.Phil Dowe - 2010 - Analysis 70 (3):446-451.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Metaphysics of Omissions.Sara Bernstein - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (3):208-218.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Proportionality, Contrast and Explanation.Brad Weslake - 2013 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (4):785-797.
Moore and Schaffer on the Ontology of Omissions.David Hommen - 2014 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 45 (1):71-89.
Omissions as Possibilities.Sara Bernstein - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (1):1-23.
Proportionality and Omissions.Phil Dowe - 2010 - Analysis 70 (3):446-451.
The Four Faces of Omission.Giovanni Boniolo & Gabriele De Anna - 2006 - Philosophical Explorations 9 (3):277 – 293.
Omissions and Preventions as Cases of Genuine Causation.Ian Hunt - 2005 - Philosophical Papers 34 (2):209-233.
Proportionality and Self-Defense.Suzanne Uniacke - 2011 - Law and Philosophy 30 (3):253-272.
An Eye for an Eye: Proportionality and Surveillance.Kevin Macnish - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (3):529-548.
What is a Causal Theorist to Do About Omissions?Rebekah L. H. Rice - 2011 - Modern Schoolman 88 (1-2):123-144.
Omissions and Causal Explanations.Achille C. Varzi - 2007 - In Francesca Castellani & Josef Quitterer (eds.), Agency and Causation in the Human Sciences. Mentis Verlag. pp. 155–167.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-06-11

Total downloads
151 ( #36,991 of 2,241,577 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #30,762 of 2,241,577 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature