Authors
Daniele Bertini
University Of Rome 2, Tor Vergata
Abstract
My paper challenges the externalist mainstream assumptions towards the understanding of religious beliefs (i.e., reliabilism by W.Alston, the warrant belief approach by A.Plantinga, the neowittgensteinian analysis of doxastic systems). According to such assumptions, religious beliefs should be evaluated rational in terms of the same doxastic standard giving justification for ordinary factual beliefs. Moving from the empiricist intuition that the kind of content of belief matters to the form of belief and the justification practices for it, I argue for the claim that religious beliefs do not concern facts or experiences but assiological interpretations of facts or experiences. After some brief introductory considerations, in the second section of my paper I provide criteria for distinguishing between factual and non factual beliefs, and I offer a general account for the doxastic spectrum. In the subsequent section I characterize the assumption of religious beliefs as qualitative, mostly implicit and in the de dicto modality. In order to prove my characterization I draw a phenomenology of religious belief from individual testimonies concerning religious conversion. I finally conclude answering some objections in the fourth section of the paper.
Keywords Religious belief  Epistemology of religious belief  Religious conversion  Doxastic justification for religious belief  factual beliefs  interpretive beliefs
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Perceiving God.William P. Alston - 1986 - Journal of Philosophy 83 (11):655-665.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Anecdotal Nature of Religious Disagreements.Daniele Bertini - 2019 - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 80 (3):215-229.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Bayle on the (Ir)Rationality of Religious Belief.Kristen Irwin - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (6):560-569.
Holding the Faith True.John Zeis - 2013 - Res Philosophica 90 (2):161-170.
Religious Pluralism and the Rationality of Religious Belief.John Hick - 1993 - Faith and Philosophy 10 (2):242-249.
Can Belief in God Be Confirmed?: MARK S. MCLEOD.Mark S. Mcleod - 1988 - Religious Studies 24 (3):311-323.
Religious Beliefs and Aspect Seeing.N. K. Verbin - 2000 - Religious Studies 36 (1):1-23.
Religious Evidentialism.Katherine Dormandy - 2013 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 5 (2):63--86.
The Epistemology of Belief.Hamid Vahid - 2009 - Palgrave-Macmillan.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-06-30

Total views
155 ( #65,169 of 2,432,727 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #55,669 of 2,432,727 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes