IRB: Ethics & Human Research 34 (3):1 (2012)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Recruiting research participants based on genetic information generated about them in a prior study is a potentially powerful way to study the functional significance of human genetic variation, but it also presents ethical challenges. To inform policy development on this issue, we conducted a survey of U.S. institutional review board chairs concerning the acceptability of recontacting genetic research participants about additional research and their views on the disclosure of individual genetic results as part of recruitment. Our findings suggest there is unlikely to be a “one-size-fits-all” solution, but rather several ethically acceptable approaches to genotype-driven recruitment, depending on context. Disclosures made during the consent process for the original study and the clinical validity of the results are key considerations. Researchers must be prepared to communicate and answer questions in clear lay language about what is known and not known regarding the role of genetics in their proposed area of research
|
Keywords | info:mesh/Genotype info:mesh/Informed Consent Humans Data Collection Disclosure Genetic Research Genotype Patient Selection Informed Consent Ethics Committees, Research info:mesh/Data Collection info:mesh/Humans info:mesh/Ethics Committees, Research info:mesh/Patient Selection info:mesh/Genetic Research info:mesh/Disclosure |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
When IRBs Review Ethically Challenging Protocols: Views of IRB Chairs About Useful Resources.Nicole Sirotin, Leslie Wolf, Lance Pollack, Joseph Catania & M. Dolcini - 2010 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 32 (5):10-19.
Citations of this work BETA
Genotype-Driven Recruitment and the Disclosure of Individual Research Results.Laura M. Beskow - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (4):64-65.
Similar books and articles
Ethical Implications of Peer-Driven Recruitment: Guidelines From Public Health Research.Craig L. Fry - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (3):16-17.
Accessing Health Services Through the Back Door: A Qualitative Interview Study Investigating Reasons Why People Participate in Health Research in Canada. [REVIEW]Anne Townsend & Susan M. Cox - 2013 - BMC Medical Ethics 14 (1):40.
Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Maladaptation of the Vigilant Genotype in a Hyper-Clean World?T. V. Rajan - 2006 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 49 (2):171-177.
What's Wrong with Litigation-Driven Science? An Essay in Legal Epistemology.Susan Haack - 2008 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 32:20-35.
Recruiting and Educating Participants for Enrollment in HIV-Vaccine Research: Ethical Implications of the Results of an Empirical Investigation.S. Sifunda, P. Reddy, N. Naidoo, S. James & D. Buchanan - 2014 - Public Health Ethics 7 (1):78-85.
Racialized Genetics and the Study of Complex Diseases: The Thrifty Genotype Revisited.Yin Paradies, M. J. Montoya & Stephanie M. Fullerton - 2007 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 50 (2):203-227.
On Effective Interdisciplinary Alliances in European Business Ethics Research: Discussion and Illustration.Laura Spence - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (9-10):1029-1044.
The Nature and Context of Exploratory Experimentation: An Introduction to Three Case Studies of Exploratory Research.C. Kenneth Waters - 2007 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 29 (3):275 - 284.
Wanted—Egg Donors for Research: A Research Ethics Approach to Donor Recruitment and Compensation.Angela Ballantyne & Sheryl De Lacey - 2008 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 1 (2):145 - 164.
Attitudes of Research Ethics Board Chairs Towards Disclosure of Research Results to Participants: Results of a National Survey.S. D. MacNeil & C. V. Fernandez - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (9):549-553.
A Comparison of Internet-Based Participant Recruitment Methods: Engaging the Hidden Population of Cannabis Users in Research.Elizabeth Clare Temple & Rhonda Frances Brown - 2011 - Journal of Research Practice 7 (2):Article - D2.
Is Hirsch or Wilson Confused? A Commentary on "The Pitfalls of Heritability ".Daniel Dennett & Christopher Viger - unknown
Ethical Considerations for Volunteer Recruitment of Visual Prosthesis Trials.Yu Xia & Qiushi Ren - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):1099-1106.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2013-10-30
Total views
15 ( #694,353 of 2,498,178 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #427,476 of 2,498,178 )
2013-10-30
Total views
15 ( #694,353 of 2,498,178 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #427,476 of 2,498,178 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads