Moral intuitionism and disagreement

Synthese 191 (12):2767-2789 (2014)
Authors
Brian Besong
Ohio Dominican University
Abstract
According to moral intuitionism, at least some moral seeming states are justification-conferring. The primary defense of this view currently comes from advocates of the standard account, who take the justification-conferring power of a moral seeming to be determined by its phenomenological credentials alone. However, the standard account is vulnerable to a problem. In brief, the standard account implies that moral knowledge is seriously undermined by those commonplace moral disagreements in which both agents have equally good phenomenological credentials supporting their disputed moral beliefs. However, it is implausible to think that commonplace disagreement seriously undermines moral knowledge, and thus it is implausible to think that the standard account of moral intuitionism is true
Keywords Moral epistemology  Moral intuitionism  Seemings  Disagreement  Skepticism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-014-0420-7
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Moral Realism: A Defence.Russ Shafer-Landau - 2003 - Oxford University Press.
Epistemology of Disagreement: The Good News.David Christensen - 2007 - Philosophical Review 116 (2):187-217.
Reflection and Disagreement.Adam Elga - 2007 - Noûs 41 (3):478–502.

View all 38 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Contingency Anxiety and the Epistemology of Disagreement.Andreas L. Mogensen - 2017 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (1):n/a-n/a.
The Epistemology of Moral Disagreement.Richard Rowland - 2017 - Philosophy Compass 12 (2):1-16.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Prudent Conscience View.Brian Besong - 2014 - International Philosophical Quarterly 54 (2):127-141.
Renewing Moral Intuitionism.Elizabeth Tropman - 2009 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 6 (4):440-463.
Challenges to Audi's Ethical Intuitionism.Klemens Kappel - 2002 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (4):391-413.
Intuitionism.David Kaspar - 2012 - Continuum.
Intuitionism and Conservatism.Mark T. Nelson - 1954 - Metaphilosophy 21 (3):282-293.
The New Intuitionism.Jill Hernandez (ed.) - 2012 - London: Continuum.
Moral Intuitionism Defeated?Nathan Ballantyne & Joshua C. Thurow - 2013 - American Philosophical Quarterly 50 (4):411-422.
Faultless Moral Disagreement.Alison Hills - 2013 - Ratio 26 (4):410-427.
The Moral Evil Demons.Ralph Wedgwood - 2010 - In Richard Feldman & Ted Warfield (eds.), Disagreement. Oxford University Press.
Non-Inferential Moral Knowledge.Elizabeth Tropman - 2011 - Acta Analytica 26 (4):355-366.
The Good in the Right. [REVIEW]Vojko Strahovnik - 2005 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (15):583-589.
Intuitionism and Subjectivism.Mark T. Nelson - 1991 - Metaphilosophy 22 (1-2):115-121.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-02-12

Total downloads
502 ( #5,695 of 2,287,891 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
52 ( #7,083 of 2,287,891 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature