Thinking and Reasoning 11 (4):326 – 348 (2005)
Relatively little is known about those who consistently produce the valid response to Modus Tollens (MT) problems. In two studies, people who responded correctly to MT problems indicated how “convinced” they were by proofs of conditional reasoning conclusions. The first experiment showed that MT competent reasoners found accurate proofs of MT reasoning more convincing than similar “proofs” of invalid reasoning. Similarly, there was a tendency for MT competent reasoners to find an initial counterfactual supposition more convincing than did people who were less competent in MT. The second experiment showed that when individuals produced the correct MT response, and found correct MT proofs to be more convincing than “bogus” proofs, they were also less likely to find the conclusions to Denying the Antecedent, or Affirming the Consequent problems valid, compared to individuals who could not discriminate between valid and bogus MT proofs. These findings are discussed in terms of both their implications for the mental logic and mental models positions, and individual differences in System 1 and System 2 reasoning.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Individual Differences in Strategies for Syllogistic Reasoning.Alison Bacon, Simon Handley & Stephen Newstead - 2003 - Thinking and Reasoning 9 (2):133 – 168.
Probabilistic Proofs and Transferability.Kenny Easwaran - 2008 - Philosophia Mathematica 17 (3):341-362.
A Mental Model Analysis of Young Children's Conditional Reasoning with Meaningful Premises.Henry Markovits - 2000 - Thinking and Reasoning 6 (4):335 – 347.
Reasoning From Double Conditionals: The Effects of Logical Structure and Believability.Carlos Santamaria Juan A. Garcia-Madruga Philip & N. Johnson-Laird - 1998 - Thinking and Reasoning 4 (2):97 – 122.
What Causal Conditional Reasoning Tells Us About People's Understanding of Causality.Sieghard Beller & Gregory Kuhnm - 2007 - Thinking and Reasoning 13 (4):426 – 460.
Strategies During Complex Conditional Inferences.Kristien Dieussaert, Walter Schaeken, Walter Schroyens & Gery D'Ydewalle - 2000 - Thinking and Reasoning 6 (2):125 – 160.
The Role of Diagrams in Mathematical Arguments.David Sherry - 2009 - Foundations of Science 14 (1-2):59-74.
Conditional Reasoning Processes in a Logical Deduction Game.John B. Best - 2001 - Thinking and Reasoning 7 (3):235 – 254.
Diagrams and Proofs in Analysis.Jessica Carter - 2010 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (1):1 – 14.
Supposition and Representation in Human Reasoning.Simon J. Handley & Jonathan St B. T. Evans - 2000 - Thinking and Reasoning 6 (4):273 – 311.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #265,996 of 2,154,127 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #90,702 of 2,154,127 )
How can I increase my downloads?