Theory and Decision 73 (4):687-702 (2012)
Abstract |
This paper considers the search for the best papers by the editors of an academic journal. At each period, each editor receives a set of submissions and has to decide which paper to accept. Some editors being more demanding than others, researchers choose the quality level of their papers taking as given the composition of the editorial board. According to the specific structures of the editorial board, various equilibria may appear. We show that the journal will publish a high number of high quality papers only when the editorial board is composed by a homogeneous set of very demanding editors
|
Keywords | Editors Search equilibrium Publication market Academic journals |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s11238-012-9314-7 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
A Model of Scholarly Publishing with Hybrid Academic Journals.Damien Besancenot & Radu Vranceanu - 2017 - Theory and Decision 82 (1):131-150.
Similar books and articles
Preferential Publication of Editorial Board Members in Medical Specialty Journals.J. Luty, S. M. R. Arokiadass, J. M. Easow & J. R. Anapreddy - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (3):200-202.
Editorial Independence at Medical Journals Owned by Professional Associations: A Survey of Editors. [REVIEW]Ronald M. Davis & Marcus Müllner - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (4):513-528.
Bioethics and Its Gatekeepers: Does Institutional Racism Exist in Leading Bioethics Journals? [REVIEW]Subrata Chattopadhyay, Catherine Myser & Raymond De Vries - 2013 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (1):7-9.
Reflections on Ethics in Journal Publications.Deborah Poff - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):51-55.
Science Journal Editors' Views on Publication Ethics: Results of an International Survey.E. Wager, S. Fiack, C. Graf, A. Robinson & I. Rowlands - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (6):348-353.
Peer Review for Journals: Evidence on Quality Control, Fairness, and Innovation.J. Scott Armstrong - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):63-84.
Accessibility and Transparency of Editor Conflicts of Interest Policy Instruments in Medical Journals.Elise Smith, Marie-Josée Potvin & Bryn Williams-Jones - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (11):679-684.
Exploring Why and How Journal Editors Retract Articles: Findings From a Qualitative Study.Peter Williams & Elizabeth Wager - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):1-11.
The ICMJE and URM: Providing Independent Advice for the Conduct of Biomedical Research and Publication.M. B. Weyden - 2007 - Mens Sana Monographs 5 (1):15.
Research Into Quality Management and Social Responsibility.Juan José Tarí - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 102 (4):623-638.
Are Referees Sufficiently Informed About The Editor'S Practice?Ruth Ben-Yashar & Shmuel Nitzan - 2001 - Theory and Decision 51 (1):1-11.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2013-12-01
Total views
86 ( #114,489 of 2,401,778 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #61,808 of 2,401,778 )
2013-12-01
Total views
86 ( #114,489 of 2,401,778 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #61,808 of 2,401,778 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads