Understanding the Logical Constants and Dispositions

Abstract
Many philosophers claim that understanding a logical constant (e.g. ‘if, then’) fundamentally consists in having dispositions to infer according to the logical rules (e.g. Modus Ponens) that fix its meaning. This paper argues that such dispositionalist accounts give us the wrong picture of what understanding a logical constant consists in. The objection here is that they give an account of understanding a logical constant which is inconsistent with what seem to be adequate manifestations of such understanding. I then outline an alternative account according to which understanding a logical constant is not to be understood dispositionally, but propositionally. I argue that this account is not inconsistent with intuitively correct manifestations of understanding the logical constants.
Keywords Logical Constants  Implicit Definitions  Dispositions  Understanding Language
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2010
DOI 10.4148/biyclc.v5i0.279
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Is Logical Knowledge Dispositional?Julien Murzi & Florian Steinberger - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (1):165-183.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Implicit Definition and the Application of Logic.Thomas Kroedel - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 158 (1):131-148.
Logical Constants.K. Warmbrod - 1999 - Mind 108 (431):503 - 538.
Reasoning and Representing.Mark Eli Kalderon - 2001 - Philosophical Studies 105 (2):129-160.
The Problem of Logical Constants.Mario Gomez-Torrente - 2002 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 8 (1):1-37.
Logical Knowledge and Ordinary Reasoning.Corine Besson - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 158 (1):59-82.
Problems for Logical Pluralism.Owen Griffiths - 2013 - History and Philosophy of Logic 34 (2):170 - 182.
Analyticity and Implicit Definition.Kathrin Glüer - 2003 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 66 (1):37-60.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-03-19

Total downloads

260 ( #12,816 of 2,169,144 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

38 ( #7,126 of 2,169,144 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums