Philosophy Compass 6 (10):689-698 (2011)

Authors
Talia Bettcher
California State University, Los Angeles
Abstract
Berkeley didn’t write very much about his ‘philosophy of mind’ and what he did write is rather perplexing and perhaps inconsistent. The most basic problem is that it just isn’t clear what a mind is for Berkeley. Unsurprisingly, many interpretations tend to understand Berkeleian spirit in models provided by other philosophers – interpretations in which Berkeleian spirit turns out to be a close cousin of the Cartesian ego, Lockean spiritual substratum, Lockean self, and Humean bundle of perceptions. Stephen H. Daniel and I have each offered different interpretations of Berkeley that refuse to reduce Berkeley’s account of spirit to that of other canonical thinkers and, indeed, which place Berkeleian spirit in some tension with the Aristotelian‐Cartesian‐Lockean traditions. In this paper, I argue that Daniel’s account is too extreme in that it implausibly removes Berkeley from this tradition altogether. I show how my account avoids that extreme and I defend it against some objections.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/phco.2011.6.issue-10
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 57,077
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Berkeley’s Thought.George Sotiros Pappas - 2000 - Cornell University Press.
Berkeley's Christian Neoplatonism, Archetypes, and Divine Ideas.Stephen H. Daniel - 2001 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 39 (2):239-258.
Berkeley’s Thought. [REVIEW]Lex Newman - 2002 - Philosophical Review 111 (2):314-318.

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

How Berkeley Redefines Substance.Stephen H. Daniel - 2013 - Berkeley Studies 24:40-50.
Berkeley's Active Self.Jonathan Dancy - 2005 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 1 (1):5-20.
Matter and Spirit in Berkeley.Robert James Mckim - 1982 - Dissertation, Yale University
Mob Metaphysics: An Interpretation of Berkeley's Idealism.John Russell Roberts - 2002 - Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Berkeley's Christian Neoplatonism, Archetypes, and Divine Ideas.Stephen H. Daniel - 2001 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 39 (2):239-258.
Stoicism in Berkeley's Philosophy.Stephen H. Daniel - 2011 - In Bertil Belfrage & Timo Airaksinen (eds.), Berkeley's Lasting Legacy: 300 Years Later. Cambridge Scholars Press. pp. 121-34.
Descartes and Berkeley on Mind: The Fourth Distinction.Walter Ott - 2006 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (3):437 – 450.
The Ramist Context of Berkeley's Philosophy.Stephen H. Daniel - 2001 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 9 (3):487 – 505.
Berkeley.Daniel E. Flage - 2014 - Polity.
God and First Person in Berkeley.George Botterill - 2007 - Philosophy 82 (1):87-114.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-10-11

Total views
71 ( #140,528 of 2,411,348 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #149,477 of 2,411,348 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes