Life Sciences, Society and Policy 14 (1):1-20 (2018)
Abstract |
The emerging field of synthetic biology, the designing and construction of biological parts, devices and systems for useful purposes, may simultaneously resolve some issues and raise others. In order to develop applications robustly and in the public interest, it is important to organize reflexive strategies of assessment and engagement in early stages of development. Against this backdrop, initiatives related to the concept of Responsible Research and Innovation have also appeared. This paper describes such an initiative: the construction of future scenarios to explore the plausibility and desirability of potential synthetic biology innovations. We guided teams of synthetic biology students who participated in the large international Genetically Engineered Machines competition, in constructing scenarios aimed at exploring the plausibility and desirability of potential synthetic biology innovations. In this paper we aim to examine to what extent, and how, constructing such future scenarios contributes to RRI. In order to do so, we conducted observations and interviews to understand what kind of learning and reflection was promoted by constructing the scenarios in terms of four dimensions, which are discussed prominently in the literature on RRI: anticipation, inclusion, reflexivity and responsiveness. While we focus on how constructing future scenarios can contribute to strengthening RRI at a project level, we also consider how far our experiment may foster RRI in the iGEM competition in general, and perhaps even inspire constructive collaboration between ‘social scientists’ and ‘natural scientists’ in the context of larger scientific research programmes.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1186/s40504-018-0082-1 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Exploring Political Views on Synthetic Biology in the Netherlands.Virgil Rerimassie - 2016 - NanoEthics 10 (3):289-308.
Challenges for the European Governance of Synthetic Biology for Human Health.Conor M. W. Douglas - 2014 - Life Sciences, Society and Policy 10 (1).
Ethical Perspectives on Synthetic Biology.Bernadette Bensaude Vincent - 2013 - Biological Theory 8 (4):368-375.
Innovation and Systems Change: The Example of Mobile, Collaborative Workplaces. [REVIEW]Hans Schaffers - 2005 - AI and Society 19 (4):334-347.
Synthetic Biology: A Bridge Between Functional and Evolutionary Biology.Michel Morange - 2009 - Biological Theory 4 (4):368-377.
Science Policy and Concomitant Research in Synthetic Biology—Some Critical Thoughts.Kristin Hagen - 2016 - NanoEthics 10 (2):201-213.
Misconceptions of Synthetic Biology: Lessons From an Interdisciplinary Summer School.Cyprien Verseux, Carlos G. Acevedo-Rocha, Fabio Chizzolini & Lynn J. Rothschild - 2016 - NanoEthics 10 (3):327-336.
Beyond Patchwork Precaution in the Dual-Use Governance of Synthetic Biology.Alexander Kelle - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):1121-1139.
Synthetic Biology: Programming Cells for Biomedical Applications.Maximilian Hörner, Nadine Reischmann & Wilfried Weber - 2012 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 55 (4):490-502.
The Study of the Future, Social Forecasting, Mutations: Semiotic Challenges and Contributions.Giulia Ceriani - 2017 - Semiotica 2017 (219):471-484.
Synthetic Biology: A Challenge to Mechanical Explanations in Biology?Michel Morange - 2012 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 55 (4):543-553.
Editors' Introduction to Special Issue.Ute Deichmann, Michel Morange & Anthony S. Travis - 2012 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 55 (4):470-472.
Autonomy and Fear of Synthetic Biology: How Can Patients’ Autonomy Be Enhanced in the Field of Synthetic Biology? A Qualitative Study with Stable Patients.Milenko Rakic, Isabelle Wienand, David Shaw, Rebecca Nast & Bernice S. Elger - 2017 - Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (2):375-388.
Constructing Productive Engagement: Pre-Engagement Tools for Emerging Technologies.Haico te Kulve & Arie Rip - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):699-714.
An Update of Public Perceptions of Synthetic Biology: Still Undecided?Mirko Ancillotti, Virgil Rerimassie, Stefanie B. Seitz & Walburg Steurer - 2016 - NanoEthics 10 (3):309-325.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2018-09-15
Total views
9 ( #892,624 of 2,411,684 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #346,414 of 2,411,684 )
2018-09-15
Total views
9 ( #892,624 of 2,411,684 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #346,414 of 2,411,684 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads