Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 24 (1):213-229 (2021)

Monika Betzler
Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München
Jörg Löschke
University of Zürich
Although collegial relationships are among the most prevalent types of interpersonal relationships in our lives, they have not been the subject of much philosophical study. In this paper, we take the first step in the process of developing an ethics of collegiality by establishing what qualifies two people as colleagues and then by determining what it is that gives value to collegial relationships. We argue that A and B are colleagues if both exhibit sameness regarding at least two of the following three features: the same work content or domain of activity; the same institutional affiliation or common purpose; and/or the same status or level of responsibility. Moreover, we describe how the potential value of collegial relationships is grounded in the relationship goods that two colleagues have reason to generate qua colleagues, namely, collegial solidarity and collegial recognition. Two interesting conclusions that can be drawn from our analysis are that one has to be proficient at one’s work if one is to be considered a good colleague and that we are also more likely to be better colleagues if we regard the work we do as valuable. Finally, we draw special attention to the working conditions that are conducive to the generation of good collegial relationships and suggest some policies to promote them.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10677-021-10165-9
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,740
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Understanding Why.Alison Hills - 2015 - Noûs 49 (2):661-688.
Love as Valuing a Relationship.Niko Kolodny - 2003 - Philosophical Review 112 (2):135-189.
Love’s Vision.Troy Jollimore - 2011 - Princeton University Press.

View all 32 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Collegial Ethics: Supporting Our Colleagues.Michael J. Kuhar & Dorthie Cross - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):677-684.
Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes.Martin Lin - 2004 - Philosophical Review 113 (1):139-143.
Taking Responsibility: Truth, Trust, and Justice.Jon Nixon - forthcoming - In Paul Gibbs, Jill Jameson & Alex Elwick (eds.), Values of the University in a Time of Uncertainty. Springer Verlag.
Ethical Relationships in the Teaching Profession in Slovakia.Marta Gluchmanova - 2016 - Journal of Educational Sciences and Psychology 6 (2):1-20.
Can a Robot Be a Good Colleague?Sven Nyholm & Jilles Smids - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (4):2169-2188.
Collegial Propositions.Stephen Watt - 2005 - Symploke 13 (1):18-29.
Other Religions as Sacred Reminders.Donald Walhout - 1970 - Religious Studies 6 (3):201 - 208.


Added to PP index

Total views
42 ( #260,529 of 2,462,895 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #34,230 of 2,462,895 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes