When not to choose: A case study

Abstract
Life situations often seem to require dualistic, either or decision making, but this common method does not always clarify moral decisions. To show this, standard arguments on why to choose or not to choose the sex or ones child are presented. Then, our feminist thinking, which regards clusters of values, and which reframes questions rather than choosing between desirable alternatives, suggests another possibility, in a gynandrous world vision
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF01149836
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,396
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Sweatshops, Context Differentiation, and the Rational Person Standard.John Alexander - 2011 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 18 (1):68-74.
Can God Choose a World at Random?Klaas J. Kraay - 2009 - In Yujin Nagasawa & Erik J. Wielenberg (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Religion. Palgrave-Macmillan.
To Choose to Choose-To Believe in This World.Ronald Bogue - 2009 - In David Norman Rodowick (ed.), Afterimages of Gilles Deleuze's Film Philosophy. University of Minnesota Press.
Parsimony and Predictive Equivalence.Elliott Sober - 1996 - Erkenntnis 44 (2):167 - 197.
Added to PP index
2010-08-30

Total downloads
5 ( #664,878 of 2,225,996 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #428,365 of 2,225,996 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature