Studies in Philosophy and Education 30 (3):257-269 (2011)
Abstract |
In this paper, I examine the question of how to nurture and develop conscientiousness thinkers and future citizens of diverse liberal-democratic societies from the perspective of virtue epistemology. More specifically, I examine this question in terms of how public schools might frame engagement with religious perspectives in the classroom. I begin by distinguishing between good and bad conscientiousness through an exploration of current work in the field of virtue epistemology. I then follow Kenneth Strike in his defense of the need for a more robust engagement with religious perspectives as a liberal educational imperative. I argue that basing a framework for engagement on VE, particularly the notion of subjective justification, has significant benefits. My main interest in developing a framework for what I deem to be a necessary supplemental dimension of citizenship education focused on religious engagement is in underlining the responsibility that liberal educators have in regulating what is often a highly contentious and unfortunately caddish debate surrounding religion and the religious. I conclude that by eschewing this responsibility educators are potentially missing out on significant resources for supporting the liberal-democratic educational agenda.
|
Keywords | Liberal education Conscientiousness Virtue epistemology Engagement Religious diversity |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s11217-010-9214-7 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Naturalistic Epistemology and Reliabilism.Alvin I. Goldman - 1994 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 19 (1):301-320.
Common Schools and Uncommon Conversations: Education, Religious Speech and Public Spaces.Kenneth A. Strike - 2007 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 41 (4):693–708.
"Pure" Versus "Practical" Epistemic Justification.James A. Montmarquet - 2007 - Metaphilosophy 38 (1):71–87.
View all 8 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Other People’s Problems: Student Distancing, Epistemic Responsibility, and Injustice.Matt Whitt - 2016 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 35 (5):427-444.
Similar books and articles
Aid to Non-Public Schools.George A. Kelly - 1971 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 46 (4):485-519.
How (Not What) Shall We Think About Human Rights and Religious Arguments: Public Reasoning and Beyond.Mathias Thaler - 2010 - E-Cadernos CES (9):115–133.
Machineries for Making Publics: Inscribing and De-Scribing Publics in Public Engagement.Ulrike Felt & Maximilian Fochler - 2010 - Minerva 48 (3):219-238.
Immunity or Empowerment: John Courtney Murray and the Question of Religious Liberty.Todd David Whitmore - 1993 - Journal of Religious Ethics 21 (2):247 - 273.
James G. Dwyer, Religious Schools V Children's Rights:Religious Schools V.Laurence D. Houlgate - 1999 - Ethics 110 (1):192-194.
Manifestation of Belief and Religious Symbols at Schools: Setting Boundaries in English Courts.Sylvie Bacquet - unknown
The Balance Between Expertise and Authority in Citizen Engagement About New Biotechnology.David Castle - 2006 - Techne 9 (3):1-13.
Student Rights to Religious Expression and the Special Characteristics of Schools.Bryan R. Warnick - 2012 - Educational Theory 62 (1):59-74.
What Constitutes Adequate Public Consultation? Xenotransplantation Proceeds in Australia.Peta S. Cook - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (1):67-70.
The Privatized Public: Antagonism for a Radical Democratic Politics in Schools?Deron Boyles - 2011 - Educational Theory 61 (4):433-450.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2012-08-28
Total views
28 ( #375,404 of 2,420,737 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #543,246 of 2,420,737 )
2012-08-28
Total views
28 ( #375,404 of 2,420,737 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #543,246 of 2,420,737 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads