The Hybrid Theory of Stories and Arguments Applied to the Simonshaven Case

Topics in Cognitive Science 12 (4):1152-1174 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Bex analyzes the case with an informal version of his hybrid theory, which combines scenario construction and argumentation. Arguments based on evidence can be used to reason about alternative scenarios. Bex claims that his hybrid theory provides the best of both worlds by combining cognitively feasible story‐based reasoning with more detailed rational argumentation. However, like the argument‐based approach, the hybrid theory does not provide a systematic account of uncertainty.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Legal stories and the process of proof.Floris Bex & Bart Verheij - 2013 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 21 (3):253-278.
Argument from analogy in legal rhetoric.Douglas Walton - 2013 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 21 (3):279-302.
An Argumentation‐Based Analysis of the Simonshaven Case.Henry Prakken - 2020 - Topics in Cognitive Science 12 (4):1068-1091.
Hybrid Identities and Hybrid Equational Logic.Klaus Denecke - 1995 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 41 (2):190-196.
Hybrid Arguments.Mark Vorobej - 1995 - Informal Logic 17 (2).
Hybrid Texts and Uniform Law? The Multilingual Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union.Karen McAuliffe - 2011 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 24 (1):97-115.
Hybridizing Moral Expressivism and Moral Error Theory.Toby Svoboda - 2011 - Journal of Value Inquiry 45 (1):37-48.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-05-07

Downloads
14 (#995,076)

6 months
5 (#648,432)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?