What is “Formal Logic”?

Abstract
“Formal logic”, an expression created by Kant to characterize Aristotelian logic, has also been used as a name for modern logic, originated by Boole and Frege, which in many aspects differs radically from traditional logic. We shed light on this paradox by distinguishing in this paper five different meanings of the expression “formal logic”: (1) Formal reasoning according to the Aristotelian dichotomy of form and content, (2) Formal logic as a formal science by opposition to an empirical science, (3) Formal systems in the sense of Hilbert, Curry and the formalist school, (4) Symbolic logic, a science using symbols, such as Venn diagrams, (5) Mathematical logic, a mathematical approach to reasoning. We argue that these five meanings are independent and that the meaning (5) is the one which better characterized modern logic, which should therefore not be called “formal logic”
Keywords Conference Proceedings  Contemporary Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI wcp22200813927
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,721
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Speed Up the Conception of Logical Systems with Test-Driven Development.Mathieu Vidal - 2014 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 23 (1):83-103.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Logic, Form and Matter.Barry Smith & David Murray - 1981 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 55 (1):47 - 74.
Béziau's Translation Paradox.Lloyd Humberstone - 2005 - Theoria 71 (2):138-181.
An Introduction to Formal Logic.Peter Smith - 2003 - Cambridge University Press.
Formal Logic and Formal Ontology in Husserl's Phenomenology.Frederick James Crosson - 1962 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 3 (4):259-269.
The Different Ways in Which Logic is (Said to Be) Formal.Catarina Dutilh Novaes - 2011 - History and Philosophy of Logic 32 (4):303 - 332.
What Does It Mean to Say That Logic is Formal?John MacFarlane - 2000 - Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh
Idempotent Full Paraconsistent Negations Are Not Algebraizable.Jean-Yves Béziau - 1998 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 39 (1):135-139.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

154 ( #29,893 of 2,158,821 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

8 ( #41,325 of 2,158,821 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums