Hypatia 25 (1):140-156 (2010)

Authors
Asha Bhandary
University of Iowa
Abstract
This essay assess the compatibility of Eva Kittay's dependency critique with Rawlsian political liberalism. I argue for the inclusion of a modified version of Kittay's revisions within Rawlsian theory in order to yield a theory that suppports a substantial subset of dependency work. Beyond these selected changes, however, I argue that Kittay's other proposed changes should not be included because they are incompatible with Rawls, and furthermore, their incorporation does not yield a theory that includes utter dependents.
Keywords Dependency care  Rawls  Liberalism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01088.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,703
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Political Liberalism.John Rawls - 1993 - Columbia University Press.
Justice as Fairness: A Restatement.John Rawls (ed.) - 2001 - Harvard University Press.
Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Core of Care Ethics.Stephanie Collins - 2015 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
The Original Position.Timothy Hinton (ed.) - 2015 - Cambridge University Press.
Liberal Feminism.Amy Baehr - 2013 - In Edward Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. pp. 150-166.
The Arrow of Care Map: Abstract Care in Ideal Theory.Asha L. Bhandary - 2017 - Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 3 (4):1-27.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-12-06

Total views
63 ( #173,825 of 2,462,531 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,311 of 2,462,531 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes