Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (2):223-236 (2014)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
In Humanity’s End: Why We Should Reject Radical Enhancement, Nicholas Agar presents a novel argument against the prospect of radical life-extension. Agar’s argument hinges on the claim that extended lifespans will result in people’s lives being dominated by the fear of death. Here we examine this claim and the surrounding issues in Agar’s discussion. We argue, firstly, that Agar’s view rests on empirically dubious assumptions about human rationality and attitudes to risk, and secondly, that even if those assumptions are granted, the fears that Agar adverts to are unlikely to dominate people’s lives if and when radical life-extension is made possible. Further, we claim that the structure of the decision-making process around life-extension is unlikely to be the way that it would have to be in order for Agar’s claims about fear of death to make sense. Finally, we argue that Agar is implicitly committed to a narrow conception of human value. In response, we suggest that the pursuit of life-extension can itself be seen as an expression of certain important aspects of our distinctively human nature.
|
Keywords | Life-extension Human enhancement Agar Transhumanism Aging |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s10677-013-9431-6 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Reasons and Persons.Joseph Margolis - 1986 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):311-327.
Beyond Humanity?: The Ethics of Biomedical Enhancement.Allen E. Buchanan - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
View all 33 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Liberalism and Eugenics.Robert Sparrow - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):499 - 517.
Life-Extension and the Malthusian Objection.John K. Davis - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (1):27 – 44.
On the Irrationality of Mind-Uploading: A Rely to Neil Levy. [REVIEW]Nicholas Agar - 2012 - AI and Society 27 (4):431-436.
Humanity's End: Why We Should Reject Radical Enhancement, by Nicholas Agar. [REVIEW]Matt James - 2011 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 17 (1):133-136.
The Moral Value of Moss – Nicholas Agar, Life's Intrinsic Value.R. Joyce - 2002 - Biology and Philosophy 17 (3):435-444.
Life Extension Research: Health, Illness, and Death.Leigh Turner - 2004 - Health Care Analysis 12 (2):117-129.
Pt. IV. The End of Life. The Definition of Death / Stuart Youngner ; The Aging Society and the Expansion of Senility: Biotechnological and Treatment Goals / Stephen Post ; Death is a Punch in the Jaw: Life-Extension and its Discontents / Felicia Nimue Ackerman ; Precedent Autonomy, Advance Directives, and End-of-Life Care / John K. Davis ; Physician-Assisted Death: The State of the Debate. [REVIEW]Gerald Dworkin - 2007 - In Bonnie Steinbock (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics. Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2013-05-31
Total views
430 ( #22,506 of 2,507,683 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
32 ( #28,040 of 2,507,683 )
2013-05-31
Total views
430 ( #22,506 of 2,507,683 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
32 ( #28,040 of 2,507,683 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads