Rationality, argumentation and embarrassment: A study of four logical alternatives (catuṣkoṭi) in buddhist logic

Philosophy East and West 34 (3):303-319 (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Embarrassment and Self-Esteem.Béla Szabados - 1990 - Journal of Philosophical Research 15:341-349.
Law, logic, rhetoric: A procedural model of legal argumentation.Arno R. Lodder - 2004 - In S. Rahman (ed.), Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 569--588.
The logical form of catuṣkoṭi: A new solution.R. D. Gunaratne - 1980 - Philosophy East and West 30 (2):211-239.
Buddhist logic: a fresh study of Dharmakīrti's philosophy.Lata S. Bapat - 1989 - Delhi, India: Bharatiya Vidya Prakashan.
Monastic debate in Tibet: a study on the history and structures of bsdus grwa logic.Shunzō Onoda - 1992 - Wien: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien. Edited by Bsod-nams-lhun-grub.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
105 (#163,695)

6 months
11 (#225,837)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Nāgārjuna’s Catuṣkoṭi.Jan Westerhoff - 2006 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 34 (4):367-395.
Remnants of Words in Indian Grammar.Sanjit Chakraborty - 2018 - APA Asian and Asian-American Philosophers and Philosophies 18 (1):39-42.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references