Grazer Philosophische Studien 96 (3):401-418 (2019)

Authors
Claudia Bianchi
Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (Milan)
Abstract
According to Mitchell Green, speech act theory traditionally idealizes away from crucial aspects of conversational contexts, including those in which the speaker’s social position affects the possibility of her performing certain speech acts. In recent times, asymmetries in communicative situations have become a lively object of study for linguists, philosophers of language and moral philosophers: several scholars view hate speech itself in terms of speech acts, namely acts of subordination. The aim of this paper is to address one of the main objections to accounts of hate speech in terms of illocutionary speech acts, that is the Authority Problem. While the social role of the speaker is the focus of several approaches, the social role of the audience has too often been neglected. The author will show that not only must the speaker have a certain kind of standing or social position in order to perform speech acts of subordination, but also the audience must typically have a certain kind of standing or social position in order to either license or object to the speaker’s authority, and her acts of subordination.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/18756735-09603010
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,489
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Framing the Epistemic Schism of Statistical Mechanics.Javier Anta - 2021 - Proceedings of the X Conference of the Spanish Society of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Subordinating Speech.Ishani Maitra - 2012 - In Mary Kate McGowan Ishani Maitra (ed.), Speech and Harm: Controversies Over Free Speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 94-120.
Illokutionäre akte und konventionalit ät.Friedrich Christoph Dörge - 2000 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 60 (1):125-150.
II—Illocution, Recognition and Cooperation.Jane Heal - 2013 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 87 (1):137-154.
Superlative Quantifiers and Meta-Speech Acts.Ariel Cohen & Manfred Krifka - 2014 - Linguistics and Philosophy 37 (1):41-90.
Transformations of Illocutionary Acts.Aaron Sloman - 1969 - Analysis 30 (2):56 - 59.
Three Approaches to the Study of Speech Acts.Maciej Witek - 2013 - Dialogue and Universalism 23 (1):129-141.
Recognition, Authority Relations, and Rejecting Hate Speech.Suzanne Whitten - 2019 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 22 (3):555-571.
Possibility Puzzle From Speech Act Theory Perspective.Bartosz Biskup - 2018 - Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies 9 (1):67-88.
Expressive Speech Acts in Educational E-Chats.Carmen Maíz-Arévalo - 2017 - Pragmática Sociocultural 5 (2):151-178.
Indirect Speech Acts.Nicholas Asher & Alex Lascarides - 2001 - Synthese 128 (1):183-228.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-09-25

Total views
26 ( #441,730 of 2,520,891 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,457 of 2,520,891 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes