Continental Philosophy Review 43 (3):373-389 (2010)
Irigaray’s engagement with Aristotelian physics provides a specific diagnosis of women’s ontological and ethical situation under Western metaphysics: Women provide place and containership to men, but have no place of their own, rendering them uncontained and abyssal. She calls for a reconfiguration of this topological imaginary as a precondition for an ethics of sexual difference. This paper returns to Aristotelian cosmological texts to further investigate the topologies of sexual difference suggested there. In an analysis both psychoanalytic and phenomenological, the paper rigorously traces a teleological and oedipal narrative implicit in the structure of the Aristotelian cosmos, in which desire for the mother is superseded by love for the father. Further, the paper argues that this narrative is complicated by certain other elements in the Aristotelian text—aporias involving the notion of boundary and the relationship between space and time, the fallenness of the feminine, and the ineliminably aleatory qualities of matter. The paper concludes that such elements may provide material for disrupting this teleology of gender, opening onto not merely an ethics of sexual difference, but providing space and place for a proliferation of non-normative, queer, transgender and intersex modes of sexed and gendered subjectivity.
|Keywords||Aristotle Irigaray Place Physics Gender Psychoanalysis|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity.Judith Butler - 1990 - Routledge.
On Female Body Experience: "Throwing Like a Girl" and Other Essays.Iris Marion Young - 2005 - Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
An Examination of Irigaray's Commitment to Transcendental Phenomenology in The Forgetting of Air and The Way of Love.Anne Leeuwen - 2013 - Hypatia 28 (3):452-468.
I Love to You: Sketch for a Felicity Within History.Luce Irigaray - 1996 - Routledge.
Sexuate Difference, Ontological Difference: Between Irigaray and Heidegger. [REVIEW]Anne van Leeuwen - 2010 - Continental Philosophy Review 43 (1):111-126.
Luce Irigaray and the Philosophy of Sexual Difference.Alison Stone - 2006 - Cambridge University Press.
Subjectivity and Sexual Difference: New Figures of the Feminine in Irigaray and Cavarero. [REVIEW]Diane Perpich - 2003 - Continental Philosophy Review 36 (4):391-413.
A Politics of Impossible Difference: The Later Work of Luce Irigaray.Penelope Deutscher - 2002 - Cornell University Press.
Proximities: Irigaray and Heidegger on Difference. [REVIEW]Krzysztof Ziarek - 2000 - Continental Philosophy Review 33 (2):133-158.
The Bodies of Women: Ethics, Embodiment, and Sexual Difference.Rosalyn Diprose - 1994 - Routledge.
Questioning Nature: Irigaray, Heidegger and the Potentiality of Matter. [REVIEW]Helen Fielding - 2003 - Continental Philosophy Review 36 (1):1-26.
Forcefully Subverting or Reinforcing Dichotomies? Elizabeth Grosz‟s Feminist Rereading of Charles Darwin, Via the Perspectives of Jacques Derrida and Luce Irigaray.Evelien Geerts - manuscript
A Poetics of Being-Two: Irigaray's Ethics and Post-Symbolist Poetry.M. F. Simone Roberts - 2010 - Lexington Books.
Transforming Sacrifice: Irigaray and the Politics of Sexual Difference.Anne Caldwell - 2002 - Hypatia 17 (4):16-39.
Becoming Undone: Darwinian Reflections on Life, Politics, and Art.E. A. Grosz - 2011 - Duke University Press.
Added to index2010-11-27
Total downloads138 ( #34,633 of 2,172,658 )
Recent downloads (6 months)30 ( #9,820 of 2,172,658 )
How can I increase my downloads?