The Revision Procedure, the Role of the Constitutional Court in the Referendum Procedure and the President Dismissal

Annals of Philosophy, Social and Human Disciplines 1:131-136 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The revision procedure combines specific techniques of the representative democracy with those specific to direct democracy, both by enshrining popular constitutional initiative, and by giving the social corpus the possibility to intervene at the end of the revision process towards a referendum. The Constitutional Court has no constitutional control on any laws resulting from the referendum. The referendum is actually a popular revocation, so the president is revoked, not dismissed.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Types of referendum in revised Constitution.Ştefan Alexandru Băişanu - 2011 - Annals of Philosophy, Social and Human Disciplines 2 (1):77-83.
Influence of the Jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court on the Criminal Procedure.Rima Ažubalytė - 2012 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 19 (3):1059-1078.
Constitutional Reforms of Citizen-Initiated Referendum. Causes of Different Outcomes in Slovenia and Croatia.Robert Podolnjak - 2015 - Revus 26.
Removal of the President of the Republic from Office: Some Theoretical Aspects of the Constitutional Delict.Vytautas Sinkevičius - 2010 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 122 (4):71-94.
Načini promjene Ustava Republike Hrvatske i Ustava Republike Slovenije - komparativni prikaz.Vedran Ceranic - 2016 - Fip: Journal of Finance and Law 4 (1):89-113.
How difficult should it be to amend constitutional laws?Kristian Skagen Ekeli - 2007 - Scandinavian Studies in Law 52:79-101.
The Implementation of Rulings of the Constitutional Court in Legislation (article in Lithuanian).Vytautas Sinkevičius - 2011 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 18 (2):497-516.
Protection of Public Interest in Civil Procedure and the Doctrine of the Constitutional Court.Vytautas Nekrošius - 2012 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 19 (3):1101-1110.
A.V. Dicey: the referendum as the people's veto.Mads H. Qvortrup - 1999 - History of Political Thought 20 (3):531-546.
Should the People Decided?' Referendums in a Post-Sovereign Age, the Scottish and Catalonian Cases.Stephen Tierney - 2016 - Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 45 (2):99-118.
Connecticut Practice Book, Revision of 1963; Containing Rules and Forms for All State Courts: Supreme Court of Errors, Superior Court, Court of Common Pleas, Circuit Court; with Annotations to Connecticut Reports and Connecticut Supplement, Canons of Professional and Judicial Ethics. Connecticut - 1963 - Commission on Official Legal Publications.
The Deliberative Potential of Facultative Referendums: Procedure and Substance in Direct Democracy.el-Wakil Alice - forthcoming - .
Impact of Constitutional Justice on Lithuaniaʼs Civil Procedure.Egidija Stauskienė - 2012 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 19 (3):1079-1099.
The Constitutional Doctrine of the Returning of the Powers of the Government upon the Election of the President of the Republic: Some Aspects of Argumentation.Vytautas Sinkevičius - 2009 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 118 (4):63-84.
The Problems of Correction of the Official Constitutional Doctrine.Egidijus Jarašiūnas - 2009 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 115 (1):39-70.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-18

Downloads
5 (#1,514,558)

6 months
3 (#1,002,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references