Journal of Argumentaion in Context 1 (1):5-18 (2012)
Argumentation theory has much to offer our understanding of the doctor-patient relationship as it plays out in the context of seeking and obtaining consent to treatment. In order to harness the power of argumentation theory in this regard, I argue, it is necessary to take into account insights from the legal and bioethical dimensions of informed consent, and in particular to account for features of the interaction that make it psychologically complex: that there is a fundamental asymmetry of authority, power and expertise between doctor and patient; that, given the potential for coercion, it is a challenge to preserve the interactive balance presumed by the requirement of informed consent; and finally that the necessary condition that patients be ‘competent to consent’ may undermine the requirement of respecting patient autonomy. I argue argumentation theory has the resources to deal with these challenges and expand our knowledge, and appreciation, of the informed consent interaction in health care. Keywords: argumentation theory, informed consent, doctor-patient interaction, competency to consent, autonomy, medical paternalism
|Keywords||argumentation informed consent doctor-patient relationship medical paternalism patient autonomy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Informed Consent: A Primer for Clinical Practice.Deborah Bowman - 2011 - Cambridge University Press.
Consultation Instead of Prescription?A Model for the Structure of the Doctor?Patient Relationship.Annemarie Gethmann-Siefert - 2003 - Poiesis and Praxis 2 (1):1-27.
Respecting Autonomy Without Disclosing Information.Tom Walker - 2013 - Bioethics 27 (7):388-394.
Doctor-Family-Patient Relationship: The Chinese Paradigm of Informed Consent.Yali Cong - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (2):149 – 178.
Informed Consent: Patient Autonomy and Physician Beneficence Within Clinical Medicine. [REVIEW]Stephen Wear & Jonathan D. Moreno - 1994 - HEC Forum 6 (5):323-325.
Teaching Argumentation Theory to Doctors: Why and What.Sara Rubinelli & Claudia Zanini - 2012 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (1):66-80.
On Taylor's Justification of Medical Informed Consent.Jukka Varelius - 2012 - Bioethics 26 (4):207-214.
Informed Consent and Relational Conceptions of Autonomy.N. Stoljar - 2011 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (4):375-384.
Informed Consent as Waiver: The Doctrine Rethought?Emma C. Bullock - 2010 - Ethical Perspectives 17 (4):529-555.
The Doctor–Patient Relationship.Harry H. Gordon - 1983 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8 (3):243-256.
Informed Consent: Patient's Right or Patient's Duty?Richard T. Hull - 1985 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (2):183-198.
Reasonableness of a Doctor’s Argument by Authority: A Pragma-Dialectical Analysis of the Specific Soundness Conditions.Roosmaryn Pilgram - 2012 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (1):33-50.
Added to index2012-06-06
Total downloads26 ( #195,843 of 2,168,938 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #186,783 of 2,168,938 )
How can I increase my downloads?